Ignoring a Covariate: An Example of Simpson's Paradox

By Appleton, David R.; French, Joyce M. et al. | The American Statistician, November 1996 | Go to article overview

Ignoring a Covariate: An Example of Simpson's Paradox


Appleton, David R., French, Joyce M., Vanderpump, Mark P. J., The American Statistician


1. INTRODUCTION

All statisticians know of the dangers of ignoring a covariate that is correlated to an outcome variable and an explanatory one (Simpson 1951). Simple but convincing examples based on real data are, however, in rather short supply. We present one here in which a naive analysis suggests a beneficial effect of cigarette smoking.

In 1972-1974 a one-in-six survey of the electoral roll, largely concerned with thyroid disease and heart disease, was carried out in Whickham, a mixed urban and rural district near Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom (Tunbridge et al. 1977). Twenty years later a follow-up study was conducted (Vanderpump et al. 1995). Some of the results make interesting teaching material, and we present here those dealing with smoking habits as reported at the original survey, and whether or not the individual survived until the second survey. For the sake of simplicity we have restricted ourselves to women, and within them to the 1,314 who were classified either as current smokers or as never having smoked; there were relatively few women at the first survey (162) who had smoked but stopped, and only 18 whose smoking habits were not recorded. The 20-year survival status was determined for all the women in the original survey.

Table 1. Relationship Between Smoking Habits and 20-Year Survival
in 1314 Women

                Smoker

            Yes         No         Total

Dead        139         230          369
Alive       443         502          945
            582         732        1,314

[x.sup.2] = 9.12 on 1 df; P = .0025.

Odds ratio = .68 (95% confidence limits .53-.88).

2. RESULTS

Results are shown in Table 1. They imply a significant protective effect of smoking because only 24% of smokers died compared to 31% of nonsmokers. Can this be the correct interpretation? No, it cannot, and Table 2 shows one variable that is strongly related to both smoking and survival - namely age. Few of the older women (over 65 at the original survey) were smokers, but many of them had died by the time of follow-up.

3. DISCUSSION

We do not wish to give too much consideration here to the proper analysis of these data. However, it is clear that any sensible weighted average of the odds ratios for the different age groups will have a value of greater than unity. For example, Woolf's test applied to the first six two-by-two tables gives an overall odds ratio of 1.53 with 95% confidence limits of 1.08 and 2.16. This should be enough to indicate that we do indeed have an example of Simpson's paradox. However we do not intend to suggest that such an analysis would be totally satisfactory: it does not take the ordering of the categories into account. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Ignoring a Covariate: An Example of Simpson's Paradox
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.