Can a Museum Explain Imperialism?

By James, N. | Antiquity, December 2008 | Go to article overview

Can a Museum Explain Imperialism?


James, N., Antiquity


Empires produced some of the ancient world's grandest monuments. No doubt that helps to account for successive major exhibitions recently mounted at the British Museum. The First Emperor: China's Terracotta Army closed in April 2008, having drawn more visitors than any other since Treasures of Tutankhamun in 1972 (British Museum 2008: 66). There followed, from July to October, impressive and intriguing pieces on Hadrian, the Roman Emperor of the second century AD. The attention to large political systems is timely (James 2008: 201). Twenty-five years ago, Donald Horne (1984: 252) went so far as to declare that 'in the popularisations ... of the huge storehouse of ... artifacts ... that are such an extraordinary feature of our age .... we may find the only real potential for giving substance to human liberation'. Is this feasible in practice; and, if so, is a state museum with business sponsorship a likely place to find such enlightenment? Studying the archaeology in Hadrian, with The First Emperor as a foil, enabled us to assess these questions,

Study of empires

Ruling directly or indirectly, with more or less control over subjects' external relations if not home affairs too, empires are so diverse that one comparative study was reduced to defining imperialism as simply 'effective sovereignty' (Doyle 1986:21). The form of ancient or archaic imperialism can be specified more closely. First, without industrial technology, the communications upon which empires depend were strongly constrained--hence the prominence of roads among the Romans, the Chinese, or the Incas. Second, all archaic empires were aristocratic: they were dominated, directly or indirectly, not simply by one nation but, more particularly, by its nobles or by others co-opted to the metropolitan interest.

The history of empires has been studied from three theoretical perspectives (and varieties of each). The most familiar is the account of the emperors' and their antagonists' decisions and deeds. This one is almost taken for granted in the West because the Romans' is the case best known and the account of deeds the approach of most of the Romans' historians. Much of the epigraphy lends itself to this perspective too, of course. The British Museum's titles for its exhibitions reflected the biographical perspective. The sociological perspective, by contrast, is modern: in this view, people were the agents of institutions or movements, although personal agency is not precluded. Least familiar in the study of ancient empires is the ecological perspective, which seeks determining conditions beyond people or political and social organisations. Materialist and economic interpretations tend to depend on the sociological and ecological perspectives. Of course, this is perennial matter for archaeological debate about empires and other forms of organisation (see, for a pointed example, Paulsen 1981). Among archaeologists, historians and, no doubt, lay museum-goers too, preference for one perspective or another depends partly on their own political interests and cultural conditions. Decisions or conditions: which of these causes prevailed among the ancient empires, when, where?

The sociological perspective lends itself most easily to comparison and most readily reveals empires as a distinct form of organisation. Did all ancient empires work in the same ways under equivalent conditions? The short-lived Qin regime (that of the Terracotta Army) was succeeded by the Han empire, which was broadly similar and, surviving a crisis in the first century AD, still flourished during the Romans' apogee on the other side of the world. Both the Roman Empire and the Chinese were centred on large cities; they sought to dominate far-flung populations of similar size; and they faced certain challenges in common. How effective were they, then, how much difference did they make to everyday life in their respective metropolitan regions and provinces, and how did they affect subsequent history? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Can a Museum Explain Imperialism?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.