Decision No. 2-3/PUU-V/2007 (2007) (Indonesian Constitutional Court)

By Zerial, Natalie | Australian International Law Journal, Annual 2007 | Go to article overview

Decision No. 2-3/PUU-V/2007 (2007) (Indonesian Constitutional Court)


Zerial, Natalie, Australian International Law Journal


Introduction

After the fall of President Suharto's authoritarian 'New Order' regime in 1998, Indonesia's legal and political systems underwent a seismic process of reform (the 'reformasi eta') (1) In less than four years, the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia ('Constitution') (2) was amended no less than for four times, including the introduction of a set of human rights clauses in chapter XA that transformed Indonesia's disparate constitutional human rights protections into a comprehensive human rights framework. (3) The introduction of a constitutional human rights regime placed Indonesia in a somewhat unique and visionary position in a region that has been internationally notorious for its suspicion of 'Western' style rights regimes and where few countries have committed to either the core international human rights conventions or comprehensive internal human rights laws. (4) As a consequence, the work of Indonesia's fledgling Constitutional Court has been, and will continue to be, of interest to many within the region as a body of human rights jurisprudence offering unique insights into the ways in which human rights may be interpreted and applied within the Asia Pacific and Southeast Asian contexts.

The court's decisions have already been of more than passing significance to Australia, with two judgments having particular resonance. The first of these was the Constitutional Court's decision in 2004 regarding the constitutionality of the prosecutions of the Bali Bombers. (5) The second important decision for Australia, and the subject of the present note, was the court's decision in 2007 to uphold the constitutionality of the death penalty in the context of an appeal made by Andrew Chan, Myuran Sukumaran and Scott Rush, three of the Bali Nine who had bee caught smuggling heroin into Bali in 2005. (6).

In the process of reaching its judgment in that decision, the judges heard a panoply of expert evidence and traversed philosophy, sociology, history and religion in addition to Islamic, secular Indonesian and international law. In this context it is impossible to cover all the issues raised by the case, and as a consequence this case note will focus on the ways in which the judgment reflects a cultural and regional perspective on international human rights law, including the light it throws on the 'Asian values' debate concerning human rights. This note will consider in particular how the court approached the balance between the rights of the individual and the rights of society, and the influence of religion on various aspects of the judgment. The note will also discuss the utilisation and constitutional interpretation in a framework that conceived of the human rights aspects of Indonesia's Constitution in a global rather than merely national context.

1. Background

A. The Bali Nine

On 17 April 2005, nine young Australians, all in their late teens or twenties, were arrested in Bali and charged with trafficking commercial quantities of heroin, (7) an offence that may be punished by the death penalty under Indonesian law. (8) At their original trials, the seven 'drug mules', Matthew Norman, Si Yi Chen, Tan Due Thanh Nguyen, Renae Lawrence, Scott Rush, Michael Czugaj and Martin Stephens were sentenced to life imprisonment. (9) The remaining two, the 'ringleader', Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran, were both sentenced to death by firing squad.

At first set of appeals resulted in the life sentences originally imposed on Lawrence, Nguyen, Chen and Norman being reduced to twenty year sentences, while life sentences for Czugaj and Stephens were upheld. However, in a subsequent appeal, during which prosecutors sought to have the original life sentences reinstated, the court unexpectedly increased the sentences of Rush, Nguyen, Chen and Norman to death.

The imposition of the death penalty for these four had come at an unexpectedly late stage of the appeal process, and at a high level of the Indonesian court hierarchy, leaving few options open for challenging it. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Decision No. 2-3/PUU-V/2007 (2007) (Indonesian Constitutional Court)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.