Are Animal Advocates Biting the Hand of Dedicated Docs?

By Horvitz, Leslie Alan | Insight on the News, May 19, 1997 | Go to article overview

Are Animal Advocates Biting the Hand of Dedicated Docs?


Horvitz, Leslie Alan, Insight on the News


Biomedical researchers, under increasing attack from militant activists, are pleading for a balance between animal right and animal research. Celebrities, however, are complicating matters.

Image-conscious Hollywood celebrities have been known to embrace causes that make them seem public-spirited, including, mostly recently AIDS research and animal rights. But prominent scientists now are asserting that the two causes are mutually exclusive, charging that movie stars intent on protecting helpless animals actually are hampering the search for a cure for AIDS and other terrible afflictions.

"My message to people in Hollywood: Leave your AIDS ribbons at home," declared noted cardiologist Michael E. DeBakey, in the Wall Street Journal last December. "The patients, activists and families, as well as your fans -- and the scientists working hard on a cure -- deserve to know where you stand."

His plea has fallen on deaf ears. Pop-music stars such as Chrissie Hynde, Howard Jones, Lene Lovich, and the Indigo Girls promote animal rights. Paul McCartney has invited an animal-rights group to distribute literature on his concert tours. A well-publicized campaign, "I'd Rather Go Naked Than Wear Fur," featuring supermodels Christy Turlington, Cindy Crawford and Naomi Campbell, undoubtedly has contributed to declining fur sales.

"Animal rights are accepted without questioning," says Frankie Trull, president of the Foundation for Biomedical Research, or FBR, a Washington-based advocacy group. Such groups have a collective kitty of $1 billion a year to draw upon, says Trull, compared with FBR's $1 million annual budget. "It's very difficult to get people to contribute to basic science," she says. "But as soon as you show them a picture of a sad-eyed dog or a tortured kitten they'll put $20 in the mail to an animal-rights group right away."

Just what constitutes animal rights depends on who defines the term. According to Trull, animal-rights advocates are against the use of animals for any cause whatsoever -- not necessarily an exaggeration. "Our ultimate goal is empty cages and vegetarianism," says Jenny Woods, a spokeswoman for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA, which boasts 500,000 members, three overseas offices and an annual budget of about $12 million. PETA also favors the abolition of zoos, regarding them as prisons for animals.

Trull, on the other hand, distinguishes between animal welfare and animal rights. After all, she says, no one is eager to see animals tormented or killed. "We are an animal-loving society." However, Trull contends that animal testing is necessary if cures for many diseases are to be found, arguing that animal experimentation has led to major medical discoveries related to Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases, breast cancer and heart disease.

"We're dealing with a scientifically uneducated public which is eager to believe that there is an alternative to animal research," says Dull. "If Joe Q. Public is told that epidemiological studies or computer models are adequate substitutes, how do they know any differently? Scientists can't explain what they're doing in 30-second sound bites."

Nevertheless, the biomedical community is under fire from animal-rights advocates like never before. "We don't accept the argument that animal experimentation is necessary for any human diseases," asserts Woods. Dental students can practice their techniques on 3-D computer models of a human mouth, and training surgeons have begun to use similar models. Toxicity studies that once required live animals now are conducted using multilayered skin cultures cloned to produce as much tissue as necessary.

In any event, Woods remains unconvinced that scientists can learn anything significant from "infecting an animal with a human disease and then trying to find a cure for it," adding that the results cannot be extrapolated to humans. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Are Animal Advocates Biting the Hand of Dedicated Docs?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.