Doctors Struck off for Denying Patients the Right to Die? What a Sinister Distortion of Medical Ethics

Daily Mail (London), March 9, 2009 | Go to article overview

Doctors Struck off for Denying Patients the Right to Die? What a Sinister Distortion of Medical Ethics


Byline: Melanie Phillips

ONE OF the key aspects of a free society is the independence of the medical profession from the state.

All professions are bound by a code of ethics which ensures that they always put the interests of the public who use their services above any outside interference.

When it comes to the practice of medicine this protection for the public is of the utmost importance, since doctors have the power to affect the continuation of life itself.

That's why their cardinal rule is 'first do no harm', and why the Hippocratic Oath which frames

Hippocratic Oath which frames their ethical guidelines states 'a physician shall always bear in mind the obligation of preserving human life'.

But now, astonishing as this may seem, the doctors' own profession is changing its rules to force its members in certain circumstances actually to do harm.

The issue concerns advance directives or 'living wills' through which people can indicate that, should they ever become so ill that they can no longer communicate their wishes, they want their treatment in those circumstances to be stopped.

Priority

The General Medical Council has decided that if in future doctors ignore such directives and continue to treat such patients, they will be struck off the medical register.

But surely, you may well say while rubbing your eyes in amazement, treating patients is what doctors are supposed to do? Think again. For in certain circumstances treatment is to be redefined as harm -- because regardless of what may actually be in a patient's best interests, to act against their wishes is now deemed to be harmful.

The overriding priority now given to what people want, rather than what they need, was what lay behind the Mental Capacity Act which has given legal force to 'living wills'.

What that already means is that doctors can be prosecuted and jailed for assault if they treat a patient who has given an advance directive not to be saved. Even where such directives aren't actually written down, doctors are expected to act upon what they believe to have been the patient's wishes.

But what people want when they express such a wish may be very different from how they feel when they actually find themselves in such a situation. The very possibility that a doctor might end the life of someone who might have changed their mind but be unable to communicate this is horrifying. Yet that is what the law now forces doctors to do.

Since such patients who cannot communicate are intensely vulnerable, there is also a high possibility of their becoming victims of relatives with a vested interest in their deaths.

For these reasons if nothing else, it is imperative that doctors are free to take decisions which they consider to be in the best interests of their patient at that time.

Yet this is what the law now prohibits -- and what the General Medical Council will now strike them off the register for doing.

As a result, the terrible truth is that doctors may be sent to prison for refusing to kill their patients.

How on earth did this country arrive at such a monstrous situation? And how can the medical profession go along with such a betrayal of its deepest ethical principles? The crucial point is what is now included in the accepted definition of 'treatment'. It has always been an important medical principle that no patient should be forced to have treatment against their will.

Patients have always had the right to refuse treatment, whatever the consequences to their own lives.

Ever since the landmark case of Tony Bland, however -- the Hillsborough disaster victim whose feeding tubes were disconnected after he was left in a persistent vegetative state -- 'treatment' has been held to include giving patients food and liquids through feeding tubes. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Doctors Struck off for Denying Patients the Right to Die? What a Sinister Distortion of Medical Ethics
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.