Blind Decisions Come to Court; What Happens When a Defendant Is Denied Access to the Evidence against Him?

By Cole, David | The Nation, June 16, 1997 | Go to article overview

Blind Decisions Come to Court; What Happens When a Defendant Is Denied Access to the Evidence against Him?


Cole, David, The Nation


A little over a year ago, President Clinton signed into law the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act. At nearly the same moment, Immigration and Naturalization Service officials in New York City arrested Nasser Ahmed, a 37-year-old Egyptian man, claiming that he was a security risk because of his ties to Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, who had been convicted in October 1995 on charges of seditious conspiracy to commit terrorist bombings. While Ahmed's case is governed by immigration law that predates the Antiterrorism Act, the government's treatment of him is a disturbing sign of what can be expected as the new law takes effect.

The two most troubling provisions of the Antiterrorism Act authorize the government to deport immigrants based on secret evidence not disclosed to the immigrant or his attorney, and to impose criminal and immigration sanctions on those who provide humanitarian aid to a foreign or-ganization labeled "terrorist" by the Secretary of State. The I.N.S. has not yet implemented either provision, but its actions against Ahmed illustrate the dangers of both.

Ahmed, whose three children are U.S. citizens, is a member of a Brooklyn mosque that Sheik Abdel Rahman frequented, and served as a court-appointed paralegal and translator during the sheik's trial. Ahmed has never been charged with a crime, and the I.N.S. did not accuse him of criminal conduct when it arrested him. It merely claimed that he had overstayed his visa.

Yet Ahmed has now spent more than a year in solitary confinement in a New York City detention center. He was denied bail on the basis of confidential information that neither he nor his lawyers had a chance to see. On May 5, Immigration Judge Donn Livingston ruled that although he had "no doubt" that Ahmed's political associations "will likely result in his torture if he is returned to Egypt," and although Ahmed was entitled to political asylum based on the evidence in the public record, he was nonetheless compelled to deport him to Egypt on the basis of secret evidence about his political affiliations.

Judge Livingston was clearly troubled. It cannot be easy to deport a man to a country where you have "no doubt" that he is likely to be tortured. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Blind Decisions Come to Court; What Happens When a Defendant Is Denied Access to the Evidence against Him?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.