Three Strikes: Can We Return to Rationality?

By Vitiello, Michael | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Winter 1997 | Go to article overview

Three Strikes: Can We Return to Rationality?

Vitiello, Michael, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

I. Introduction

California's widely publicized "Three Strikes"(1) legislation was the culmination of over a decade of "get tough on crime" legislation.(2) The story surrounding Three Strikes is symptomatic of the excesses of our nation's crime prevention policy during the 1980s and 1990s.

Despite a threefold increase in the nation's prison population between 1980 and 1994,(3) Most Americans felt more vulnerable to violent crime than they did a decade earlier.(4) At a time when crime rates were declining modestly,(5) politicians in several states seized on the fear of crime as a powerful political issue. For example, in a close gubernatorial race, Governor Pete Wilson's support of Three Strikes provides a case study of sound-bite electioneering substituting for careful analysis of frustratingly complex social and penological problems.(6)

Two years of experience with Three Strikes in California has not quieted debate about the efficacy of the law. Proponents claim victory based on lower crime rates since its passage(7) while opponents point to widely reported cases, involving minor third strikes, leading to grossly disproportionate prison terms.(8)

While a number of jurisdictions have recently adopted multiple offender statutes, California's is the most draconian.(9) Section II of this article examines the key elements of California's Three Strikes legislation and the events that led to its adoption.(10) Section III then considers a significant and rapid change in penological theory that has taken place in less than a decade. During the 1960s through the mid-1980s, legislatures, judges and commentators abandoned the rehabilitative ideal of the criminal justice system. A broad political coalition oversaw a return to retribution as the justification for punishment.(11) Renewed interest in multiple offender statutes like the Three Strikes legislation signals another dramatic shift from retribution to incapacitation and, to a lesser degree, deterrence as the primary justifications for punishment.(12)

Incapacitation and deterrence are supported by utilitarian arguments; as such, they rest on factual premises. Utilitarian justifications for punishment rest on the premise that the pain inflicted by punishment is justified only if greater good results from its imposition.(13) For utilitarians, punishment should not, therefore, be imposed if it will not lead to a net benefit.

Proponents in California and elsewhere have justified the massive increase in prison construction by reference to cost benefit analyses.(14) Section III examines whether Three Strikes can deliver on its promised benefits.(15) Careful review of the claimed benefits of incapacitation suggests that those benefits have been exaggerated.(16) Franklin Zimring and Gordon Hawkins' serious study of widespread incapacitation during the 1980s casts doubt on whether Three Strikes produced a concomitant reduction in crime.(17) Their conclusions should cause hesitation in wholesale adoption of legislation like Three Strikes. Even if Three Strikes has led to a reduction in crime, we are paying far too much for those benefits.(18)

A great deal has already been written about Three Strikes, most of it negative and much of it forecasting doom.(19) Critics of Three Strikes rightly point to some potentially disastrous effects. Three Strikes has already exacerbated the racially discriminatory effects of sentencing policy.(20) Moreover, the projected costs for prison construction and operation are staggering,(21) and absent other ready revenue sources the legislature may be forced to shift funds from education to corrections.(22)

Section IV discusses a number of events that may signal rational reform of Three Strikes.(23) Rational debate was largely muted during passage of Three Strikes. If we listen carefully, we can begin to hear voices of reason. In light of that fact, section IV closes with some proposed legislative reforms that may curb some of the excesses of the penological reform of the past decade. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Three Strikes: Can We Return to Rationality?


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.