Discretion in Direct Practice: New Perspectives

By Murdach, Allison D. | Social Work, April 2009 | Go to article overview

Discretion in Direct Practice: New Perspectives


Murdach, Allison D., Social Work


The study of clinical decision making in social work has focused on various areas over the years, such as diagnosis, treatment planning, crisis intervention, and evidence-based practice. Major concerns over accountability and legal liability have recently caused the study of clinical decision making to focus almost solely on ethical situations. Although important, these developments have, unfortunately, led to the neglect of the study of more common kinds of clinical judgment, despite the fact that authors have indicated that major ethical decision making occupies only a small percentage of most practitioners' time (Vinzant & Crothers, 1998). Therefore, it would seem important to reexamine aspects of typical everyday decision making in direct practice. This article examines one such aspect, that of practitioner discretion, which has lately drawn attention in social work for its importance in certain types of clinical decision making (Torczyner, 1991; Vinzant & Crothers, 1998).

DISCRETION IN SOCIAL WORK

Discretion has been described as the art of making opportune, strategic decisions while seeking solutions to common practical problems (Simon, 1988). According to Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language (1989), discretion can be defined as "the power or right to decide or act according to one's own judgment" and also implies "freedom of judgment or choice." Such decision making has also been characterized as "flexible" "experimental" (Handler, 1986), intuitive, and "responsive" to client demands and needs (Stivers, 2001). For numerous examples of discretionary decision making, also featured in any number of social work texts, one easily available resource is the work of Gibelman (2005).

In making practical decisions, discretion (or prudence, to use traditional terminology) is often vitally important because it helps practitioners make decisions that are opportune, timely, and effective in often stressful social circumstances (Simon, 1988; Torczyner, 1991). The study of such decision making in social work practice originated in the pioneering work of Mary Richmond (1917). Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, other social work authors elaborated on her work and its implications (Follett, 1973). Although none of these authors specifically set out to analyze the concept of discretion itself, their efforts contributed greatly to an improved understanding of the ways in which this process is used in direct social work practice.

In the 1940s and 1950s, the focus on insight-oriented approaches in the social work helping relationship increased and deepened, and social work authors largely abandoned their efforts to better understand the practitioner's use of discretion in practical decision-making efforts. The growing psychiatric emphasis of that time also reinforced such tendencies, which in turn led to a lack of attention to situational factors and the practitioner's cognitive activity. However, starting in the 1960s, following the appearance of several works examining the role and activities of the community planner (Rabinovitz, 1970) and the mental operations of practitioners (Schon, 1983), the examination of practitioner involvement in everyday helping relationship issues gained renewed momentum in social work theory. Unfortunately, the topic of practitioner discretion had by this time become viewed with suspicion and distaste by public administrators and some social scientists (Gummer, 1979), who viewed freedom of decision by professionals as "lawless," unpredictable, and in need of rigorous control through accountability measures (Packer, 1968; Torczyner, 1991). Because of the contentious legal climate engendered by such sentiments, the topic of practitioner discretion again waned in clinical interest, and the ethical aspects of practitioner decision making assumed dominant importance in practice theory (Reamer, 2001).

REEXAMINING DISCRETION

At present, the growing influence on social work practice theory of other fields of practice enquiry, such as management, medicine, the social sciences, and psychology, has once again helped to draw attention to the direct practitioner's use of discretion in a wide variety of helping situations and problem-solving contexts (Keigher, 2001). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Discretion in Direct Practice: New Perspectives
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.