Foreword: National Sovereignty and Globalization

By de la Madrid H., Miguel | Houston Journal of International Law, Spring 1997 | Go to article overview

Foreword: National Sovereignty and Globalization

de la Madrid H., Miguel, Houston Journal of International Law

I. Introduction

Sovereignty has always been a concept of great controversy and debate by jurists and scholars of law and political sciences. That is due, to a large extent, to the different meanings of this concept (a frequent phenomenon in political issues), to the various circumstances that have characterized it through time and in relation to space, and to the evolution of political organization at the national and international level.

As it is known, sovereignty as an attribute of the state power was born as a doctrinal justification of absolutism, that struggled in Western Europe to impose the supremacy of monarchy on the papacy and the empire, the external front, and beyond the scattered and autonomous power of feudal organization. Bobino, Hobbes, and the various theories of divine law of the kings were politically active in this battle that finally resulted in the emergence of the absolutist state as the first manifestation of modern state in the sixteenth century.

The liberal and democratic revolutions that took place at the end of the eighteenth century, inspired in a large extent by the English constitutional system, transferred to the people or to the nation the source of political legitimacy by stating that only popular will or consensus can establish political power through the law, a necessary product of general will. The new doctrine of popular sovereignty coincided with the doctrine of the rights of men, that promoted, together with the theory of division of powers, the political and legal limitation of power with the purpose of moderating its exercise to protect people's freedom.

These key ideas were the foundation of modern constitutionalism that emerged specifically through the Charters that established the League of Nations and the United Nations. The acknowledgment of the juridical equality of the states and the non-intervention principle, fundamental pillars of contemporary international law, are logical consequences of such doctrine.

The self-determination doctrine of the peoples has given birth to a multitude of new independent political units. It has also served both the decolonization processes generated by the two World Wars as well as the disintegration of the Soviet empire. The fact is that the United Nations, founded in 1945 by 51 states, presently has 185 member countries.

The formal recognition of the principles of popular sovereignty, juridical equality of the states, and non-intervention has not been, in practice, a real obstacle for the military or economically powerful states to occasionally carry out a different policy and openly violate those principles of international law. As noted in an Orwellian phrase: "even though all animals are equal there are some more equal than others."

II. Trends in Globalization

During the last several years, some outstanding trends in international relationships and in the internal life of nation states have placed on the table of discussion, with more frequency and intensity, the scope of sovereignty and even the perspective of the existence itself of the national state. I find that the present discussion focuses on the areas of economic, political, and social globalization.

A. Economic Globalization

It is evident that interconnection or interdependence among nations has accelerated during the last few decades. The intensification of commercial activity, investments, financial transactions, tourism, and technological exchanges, notably in the transportation and communications areas, have fostered an intensive process in the integration of national economies -- regardless of their magnitude and degree of development.

Within this model, even though the advances achieved in matters of integration are different and at different paces, the trend toward forming regional economic groups implies a new interrelationship, not only of an economic nature, but with juridical, political, and social effects as well. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Foreword: National Sovereignty and Globalization


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.