Speech Deposit: Systematic Approach to Free Speech and Responsibility

By Kakeya, Hideki | Forum on Public Policy: A Journal of the Oxford Round Table, Spring 2008 | Go to article overview

Speech Deposit: Systematic Approach to Free Speech and Responsibility


Kakeya, Hideki, Forum on Public Policy: A Journal of the Oxford Round Table


1. Introduction

The most dramatic change of the world in the last decade is the spread of internet technology. Owing to this technological progress the amount of information people can access has increased dramatically. Before the surge of the internet technology, people have been dependent on the media such as newspapers, TV, radio, or books, which are all run by professional journalists. In the internet age anyone can be a journalist or an editor who gives opinions on social issues to the public. Indeed there are many internet journalists or bloggers who obtain thousands of accesses per day.

Though variety of information sources has increased, it does not necessarily mean that people can obtain surer knowledge on controversial issues. On the contrary, people tend to be more confused because they have no clues to decide which information source is reliable and which is not. Thus people can be more dismayed and uncertain as they are given wider options of information sources.

The increase of uncertainty, of course, is not only because of the increase of information. Even before the rise of the internet, the traditional media have sometimes made mistakes and people have not always believed all the information given by the newspapers or TV. When we consider the problem of uncertainty, it should be noted that we live in the age of increased complexity, as well as increased information.

Let us give you an example. In modern society almost all safety issues are related to some kind of new science and technology. This fact can be reconfirmed when we consider major safety topics which are currently at issue: nuclear power plant, avian influenza, toxic pesticides, BSE, global warming, etc. In each area there are many experts to assess the risks of these issues. The source of risk, however, is often so complicated that the results of risk assessment vary among the experts. In the academic community researchers have tried hard to obtain surer knowledge and criteria to measure the probability and the size of possible risks. Instead of the hard work by the researchers to reach agreement on objective risk assessment, there still exist many issues where experts conflict on the evaluation of risks. The main reason for this difficulty is that modern science and technology deals with the problems which cannot be measured for sure for a long period of time. For example, safety of nuclear power plants or side-effects of the long-term use of new medicine cannot be confirmed for sure soon. We need to accumulate data to predict their safety with high confidence. As for the environmental issues, whether carbon dioxide is the main cause of warmer climates is still a matter of debate though it has been long since this hypothesis was first introduced to the public [1].

Basically these uncertainties are the matters of imperfection of knowledge. Indeed, risk information given by experts or journalists almost always includes some uncertainty and often turns out to be wrong, though it always has certain facts or logic to support the idea. The problems, however, are not always that simple. Experts and journalists sometimes publish distorted information intentionally for their personal benefits. Forefront science and technology usually include difficult theories which cannot be easily understood by ordinary people. Not only many journalists, but also some experts misuse the asymmetry of information to attain their commercial success or political goals by predicting that things less probable can happen with high probabilities.

Since the issues of safety and the environment are complicated and it takes a long period of time to prove which theory is right, predictions on these issues are often forgotten when they are settled even if they obtained great attention of the public when they were first published. Even when people remember their fabrications because of the great damage it has given to the society, people usually do not have any means to punish them. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Speech Deposit: Systematic Approach to Free Speech and Responsibility
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.