An Election Side Show

By Redmond, Robert S. | Contemporary Review, July 1997 | Go to article overview

An Election Side Show


Redmond, Robert S., Contemporary Review


Everyone - media and general public alike - had ideas about why Labour won the General Election. Some gave pride of place to 'Time for a Change'. Others said it was the NHS, broken promises on taxation, pensions, Europe, or something else. What was remarkable was the number of times one heard the word sleaze - usually said with emphasis.

In the Tatton constituency, personalities and 'sleaze' were virtually the only issues and sleaze was always top of the list. Maybe, if pressed, someone would express concern about Europe and Monetary Union, but everything faded into insignificance against the really big local issue which revolved round the personalities of the two main candidates - the Conservative, Neil Hamilton and the Independent, Martin Bell.

Over the life of the last Parliament and amid growing Conservative unpopularity, there were many unhealthy stories about Tory MPs becoming involved in 'unfortunate' financial transactions. There were accusations about payment for tabling Parliamentary Questions and, to make things worse, some were admitted. Some cases were dealt with by resignations and might well have faded somewhat in public memory in the course of the election campaign as did the spicy stories about extra-marital and 'kinky' goings-on.

The continued presence of Neil Hamilton as Conservative candidate seeking re-election in Tatton ensured that the issue of 'cash for questions' did not. Whether he had gone beyond the bounds of law or Parliamentary procedure soon became irrelevant. He admitted that he had spent a weekend with his wife at the Ritz Hotel in Paris as the guest of Mohammed Fayed, the Egyptian owner of Harrods. He also admitted that he had taken an 'ex-gratia payment' (not, he insisted, a commission) from a firm to whom he introduced a constituent. Had these things been entered in the register of members' interests at the time, it is possible that he would still have been a Minister when the election came. It can be argued that disclosure was not necessary under the rules as they then existed. Mr. Hamilton is a tax barrister and says that since the payment was ex-gratia, there was no need to declare it for tax purposes. Nevertheless, as soon as these two things became known, he was in trouble. People really do not believe that MPs should behave in that way.

The strongly anti-Tory Guardian newspaper claimed that he was one of a number of MPs who had taken payment for tabling questions. He denied this hotly and began proceedings for libel. The media now kept quiet. The case was sub-judice. Neil Hamilton has a reputation for being litigious. He had already received heavy damages from the BBC which had unjustly accused him of fascist tendencies. He must have been confident that, with a clear conscience about the allegations in The Guardian, he could do the same again.

This time, however, the MP for Tatton ran into trouble. First of all, he came up against an ancient law which prevented evidence of proceedings in Parliament being used as evidence. This introduced a delay until he managed to get an amendment by inserting a new clause in a convenient bill then going through the House.

Disaster struck when Neil Hamilton had to withdraw the action almost on the eve of its opening. He had been acting jointly with Ian Greet Associates, the firm of lobbyists alleged to have paid for questions to be asked. On a legal technicality making it impossible for MP and firm to be jointly represented by the same counsel, he had to look for new advisers and this would have been beyond his means. With the action out of the way, it was no longer sub-judice and there was no restraint on The Guardian or anyone else.

Unable to afford continued litigation, Mr. Hamilton then determined to rely on the enquiry now in the hands of Sir Gordon Downey, the Parliamentary Ombudsman who would, he thought, report to the new Select Committee on Standards and Privileges in good time before the election. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

An Election Side Show
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.