The Limits of Expansion: The European Union and NATO

By Kampmark, Binoy | Contemporary Review, Winter 2008 | Go to article overview

The Limits of Expansion: The European Union and NATO


Kampmark, Binoy, Contemporary Review


BIG is not necessarily beautiful, but the current agendas of both the European Union and NATO is one of steady aggrandizement. The more members each can take, it would seem, the better. Both institutions have come to be seen as two sides of the same coin, linked by historical circumstance and political acumen. The EU prospered under the stabilizing influence of NATO in Europe, a shield against the prospects of Communist incursion. NATO, in turn, established its credentials as a Cold War alliance that went the distance, keeping the US in Europe while safeguarding Western institutions. Both now face the challenges posed by their respective enlargement, notably in the eastward push that is integrating new states at some speed. What are the implications of these moves'? Recent events suggest that such expansions may have occurred too rapidly. A check of such advances may be needed, re-assessments may have to be made. In the case of the EU, a question mark was drawn over its proposed constitution by Ireland's negative vote on the Lisbon Treaty earlier this year. While seen by some commentators as the 'useful idiots of European extremism' (to use a term of the German writer Richard Wagner), the Irish highlighted significant problems within the organization. In truth, the EU is a behemoth few of its citizens actually understand. Why, then, allow it to grow and multiply in its functions when it can barely legitimize itself before its citizenry?

With NATO, complications also arise. Having fulfilled its functions as a Cold War bulwark, every effort by its supporters is being made to find another purpose. Is it to combat terrorism? Or perhaps the crisis wrought by climate change? Will it provide security against a renascent Russian threat? The jury is out and wandering the halls. No clear founding of a rationale has been had, but, as with the EU, enlargement is on the cards.

Origins and Rationales

In many ways, the origins of both organizations, seen together, provide the cornerstones of European success after 1945. Both came about in a post-World War environment. The EU can trace its origins back to the economic interests of the European Coal and Steel Community (1951); NATO, to an anti-Soviet pact in 1949 girded by the concept of collective defence in the wake of Communism's westward expansion.

But things did not stop there. Treaty followed treaty in the development of European policy, one might even say, a European 'identity". A form of federalism came into being. Hiccups did follow, registered in the fear that the EU might be getting ahead of itself (the Lisbon Treaty being the latest). The EU, some have even argued, is suffering a crisis in legitimacy. When it is not imposing regulations that are seen as cumbersome and intrusive, with an extra layer of unwelcome bureaucracy, it is regarded as remote. The European Parliament and Commission in Brussels are perceived to be lucrative escapes for politicians. Election turnouts are low, and its representatives are satirized and mocked.

The expansion project of the EU developed apace after the European Council meeting in Copenhagen in 1993. Categories on what Central and Eastern European countries would have to meet in order to accede to the union were drawn up. These included the establishment of democratic institutions, a respect for the rule of law and various safeguards for minorities, the adoption of a market economy and the incorporation into a genuine union {political, economic, monetary). Ten countries duly joined in 2004.

Students of NATO and EU history, amongst them commentators as notable as Vaclav Havel of the Czech Republic, see both as a democratizing influence on the continent, guarantors of liberty and democracy. Other commentators see this expansion and consolidation as possessing its own 'imperial' thrust, a colonialist resurgence. (1) EU enlargement has had enormous affects on its member states. The farm industries of wealthier states. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Limits of Expansion: The European Union and NATO
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.