High Court Levels the Field: How an Arcane Tax-Law Case - Hinging Partly on a Congressional Error - May Help Ag Banks Compete with Production Credit Associations

By Baran, Mark R. | ABA Banking Journal, November 1997 | Go to article overview

High Court Levels the Field: How an Arcane Tax-Law Case - Hinging Partly on a Congressional Error - May Help Ag Banks Compete with Production Credit Associations


Baran, Mark R., ABA Banking Journal


How an arcane tax-law case--hinging partly on a congressional error--may help ag banks compete with production credit associations

Ag bankers have long complained about the tax advantages of the country's production credit associations, which comprise an arm of the Farm Credit System. A recent court case may help even the odds between ag banks and PCAs.

Approximately 65 PCAs do business around the country. PCAs are one of several types of local lending organizations under the Farm Credit System's umbrella. They make short- and medium-term loans to farmers and ranchers. PCAs borrow money from their area farm credit bank to lend to farmers, who must belong to the PCA through stock ownership--5% of the loan or $1,000, whichever is less--in order to borrow. (In times past, the government had ownership in PCAs, but that is no longer the case--and that is a key issue in the case we'll be examining.)

Officially, PCAs lack the power to accept deposits. However, in some parts of the country, PCAs permit prepayment of loans, even up to 100%, in a quasi-deposit-taking role. Borrowers receive interest on the prepaid amounts.

Ag lenders and state tax administrators nationwide anxiously awaited the outcome of a U.S. Supreme Court case known as State of Arkansas v. Farm Credit Services of Central Arkansas, PCA, et. al. On June 2, 1997, the Court unanimously decided to reverse a prior ruling in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, which held that PCAs, as federal instrumentalities, were constitutionally immune from Arkansas state sales and use tax.

The import of the high court's decision has already spread beyond the ag world. Several cases have been reversed, including one involving a federal credit union employee's claim for an exemption from a transient hotel tax. This trend indicates that subsequent claims of tax immunity will be subject to judicial scrutiny.

Limited federal ownership nullifies immunity

Attempts to gain immunity based upon designation as a federal instrumentality is not a recent development. Supreme Court cases dating back to the early 1800s established an inter-governmental immunity doctrine in an effort to create and enforce a system of federalism in our government's infancy. Justice John Marshall created the doctrine in M'Culloch v. Maryland, an 1819 case.

In contrast, modern federal instrumentalities, simply designated as such in some statutes--including PCAs and federal credit unions--are vastly different from the centuries-old perception of federal instrumentalities. Distinguishing characteristics of these modern instrumentalities include limited or nonexistent federal ownership or control; operation and structuring for profit; and direct competition with similarly situated private-sector entities. These distinguishing characteristics provide the essence of the arguments presented by the State of Arkansas and the organizations, including ABA, which filed supporting briefs with the Supreme Court.

The makings of a case

In June 1994, four federally chartered Arkansas PCAs brought suit in federal district court, claiming an exemption from Arkansas sales and income tax. Arkansas tax authorities had denied the PCAs' request for tax refunds plus formal recognition that they were exempt from state taxation. The federal district court ruled in favor of the PCAs, finding that PCAs are federal and therefore immune from state tax. Further, the district court noted that such immunity must be expressly waived by Congress in order to subject PCAs to state taxation. Arkansas' appeal to the Eight-Circuit Court of Appeals was unsuccessful.

In April of this year, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case. In support of Arkansas' position, ABA and the Nebraska Bankers Association jointly filed a friend-of-the-court brief.

Numerous arguments support state taxation of PCAs and they are supported by statutory and judicial precedent. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

High Court Levels the Field: How an Arcane Tax-Law Case - Hinging Partly on a Congressional Error - May Help Ag Banks Compete with Production Credit Associations
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.