Freedom House Presents ... Civil Society under Threat Bureaucratic Strategies of the New Authoritarians

By Puddington, Arch | Harvard International Review, Spring 2009 | Go to article overview

Freedom House Presents ... Civil Society under Threat Bureaucratic Strategies of the New Authoritarians


Puddington, Arch, Harvard International Review


After several decades of consistent progress, the state of global freedom has entered a period of stagnation and possibly even decline. The reasons for recent setbacks to liberty are numerous and complex. However, to a significant degree, the reversal in freedom of association can be attributed to the emergence of a few large and assertive authoritarian states--countries that are geostrategically important, major participants in the world economy, militarily robust, and, in a number of cases, rich in energy and other natural resources. Increasingly active on the global stage, these countries--Russia, China, Iran, and Venezuela rank at the top of the list--also function as models for less powerful regimes with anti-democratic tendencies. At times, smaller countries have even emulated the techniques employed by these larger states to smother democratic currents; in a few cases, governments have even shared "lessons learned" in the methods of repression with likeminded regimes.

Among the principal targets of the new authoritarianism is civil society. Democratic political parties, human rights organizations, women's advocates, independent trade unions, groups that investigate corruption or monitor security service abuse, organizations that seek legal reform, groups that champion minority rights or religious freedom are all organizations that seek to provide ordinary people with a voice or influence on public policy, and all have come under growing pressure from regimes that are determined to marginalize or eliminate all perceived sources of opposition power and dissent.

The result has been a notable reversal for freedom of association throughout much of the world. A new study, Freedom of Association Under Threat: Bureaucratic Strategies of the New Authoritarians, shows that over the recent period, associational rights have declined in practically every region of the world except for Western Europe and sub-Saharan Africa. The study finds that associational rights are under particular duress in the Middle East, North Africa, and the former Soviet Union. The study also shows that in the past several years, the most pronounced declines have occurred in the Asia-Pacific region and Latin America. In some instances, the study suggests, the declines are modest and may not pose a threat to a country's long-term democratic prospects. In a disturbing number of cases, however, the study points to setbacks that stem from conscious policies of the state and therefore present serious challenges to the development of free institutions. The study also finds that the rights of trade unions, historically bulwarks defending associational rights, are faring poorly in authoritarian settings and in some democracies as well.

It cannot be sufficiently emphasized that the campaign to restrict civil society runs contrary to the dominant political and cultural trends of the 21st century. These trends include freedom of movement within and across states, expanded access to information, and greatly enhanced international trade relations. Many of the regimes that have passed laws to impede the work of nongovernmental organizations have also taken steps to muzzle the press and freedom of expression. Despite the development of the Internet and other technologies, which have hampered authoritarian states' efforts to suppress the freedom of press, the evidence thus far suggests that repressing the freedom of association may prove a less formidable challenge.

Freedom of Association: A Core Right

The fact that the setbacks to associational rights are so often due to calculated state action is the most disturbing finding of the study. Freedom of association is the foundational institution of a strong civil society and an essential component of pluralistic democracy, along with free and competitive elections, freedom of expression, freedom of religion, and the rule of law. In an era in which traditional political parties have suffered a loss of credibility in many societies, freedom of association is especially important as a means of strengthening the voice of non-governmental organizations, trade unions, and other institutions that represent the interests of popular causes, constituencies, and ideas. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Freedom House Presents ... Civil Society under Threat Bureaucratic Strategies of the New Authoritarians
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.