Introducing Gene Technology to the Society: Social Implications of the Estonian Genome Project

By Korts, Kulliki | Trames, March-June 2004 | Go to article overview

Introducing Gene Technology to the Society: Social Implications of the Estonian Genome Project


Korts, Kulliki, Trames


1. Introduction

In the framework of the theory of risk society, introducing the idea of a population-based gene bank into the Estonian society is significant from several aspects. First, in most general terms, the latest developments in gene research, especially its pairing with medicine are posing a challenge to the theory of risk society developed by Ulrich Beck. Operating with the promise for better health, the primary value and necessity in modern societies, much of the public critical awareness of the potentially risky consequences of technological developments, manifested in other circumstances, is in this case seen to wither away to quite a remarkable extent. The hitherto self-transforming power of the society is no more self-evident. Secondly, the creation of gene banks constitutes the next significant landmark on the road of introducing genetic knowledge into society, affecting directly and personally large parts or, in some cases, all the members of the target society. Thirdly, the Estonian case gives an opportunity to discuss the propositions by Ulrich Beck how to balance the latently growing importance of genetic thinking in the context of a society that has considerably different experiences compared to the societies upon which the theory of risk society has been modelled.

In the following article, these theoretical considerations will be discussed in the light of the empirical findings on the public perception of the Estonian Genome Project (EGP). It will be argued that the overwhelmingly positive public acceptance of the project is the result of peculiar social context into which the idea was introduced. However, such unreflected optimism gives ground to take seriously many of the ominous visions generated by the critics concerned over the quick advance of gene technology into the society.

2. Risk society and genetic research

The theory of risk society considers the technological developments of the last century to have shaken the very foundations of modern or industrial society, and produced a new type of risk environment, characterised by an ever-present possibility for a global catastrophe. As the political-institutional answer to the growing volume of risk is weak, the actual burden of risk management lies mainly on the shoulders of individuals (Beck 1994), forcing a new type of contingency into individual life courses (Beck 1994:168; Beck and Beck-Gernsheim 2002: 2-3). However, the obvious lack of power of the modern institutions to effectively provide any guarantees against these technology-induced risks is counterbalanced by the increasing capacity of the society to react. The escalating growth of knowledge and the parallel growth of individual cultural resources (via mass education) have created emancipated, self-confident agents, ready and willing to participate in interpreting and contesting meaning. Science, the organising principle of industrial modernity is gradually losing its autonomous position and has become open to contention. As science can no longer produce clear and absolute answers, also the definition of what constitutes a risk has been removed from the closed circle of experts and been opened up to more active citizen participation and wider public debate (Beck 1994:20; Delanty 2000:159).

Such reflexive space, created in this fashion is considered a sign of the eventual humanising of technology, or the "introduction of moral issues into the now largely "instrumental" relation between human being and the created environment" (Giddens 1990:170). It is interpreted as a sign of a new or alternative modernity, defined as "risk society" or "reflexive society" (Beck 1992, Giddens 1990), where the human society has admitted responsibility towards nature in order to prevent ecological disaster. In more abstract terms, this is a vision shared by Toulmin (1990) who is arguing for the need to reconnect the two roots of modernity, science and humanistic thought. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Introducing Gene Technology to the Society: Social Implications of the Estonian Genome Project
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.