Adam Smith: Natural Theology and Its Implications for His Method of Social Inquiry

By Kim, Kwangsu | Review of Social Economy, Fall 1997 | Go to article overview

Adam Smith: Natural Theology and Its Implications for His Method of Social Inquiry


Kim, Kwangsu, Review of Social Economy


I. INTRODUCTION

In modern times, few among social scientists will agree that theology can be a starting point for scientific inquiry. It is therefore no wonder that a number of modern commentators have tended to isolate Smith's Natural Theology from his scientific study of man and society despite the well-known fact that it comprised his first lectures in the course on moral philosophy at the University of Glasgow, which were followed by others that may be called some branches of the social sciences today.(1) That is, the view that Smith's theological belief directly plays no role at all in relation to his "scientific" activities appears to represent recent conventional wisdom. In this vein Jacob Viner's remark is interesting.

Modern professors of economics and of ethics operate in disciplines which have been secularized to the point where the religious elements and implications which once were an integral part of them have been painstakingly eliminated. It is in the nature of historians of thought, however, to manifest a propensity to find that their heroes had the same views as they themselves expound, for in the intellectual world this is the greatest honor they can confer upon their heroes. If perchance Adam Smith is a hero to them, they follow one or the other of the two available methods of dealing with the religious ingredients of Smith's thought. They either put on mental blinders which hide from their sight these aberrations of Smith's thought, or they treat them as merely traditional wisdom and in Smith's day fashionable ornaments to what is essentially naturalistic and rational analysis. . . . For these writers the teleological aspects of Smith's thought have only nuisance value.(2)

Whereas Viner duly informs us about a psychological propensity of modern practitioners to understand a classical work from the present perspective of their discipline, it seems that the tendency to isolate entirely Smith's scientific performance from the religious ingredients of his thought is essentially based upon a certain element, which comes to be influential in the hermeneutic propensity of modern interpreters. This element is, in this author's opinion, a naturalistic view of science which many of them are likely, whether implicitly or explicitly, to reflect in approaching Smith's work.

We are reminded that one of the points strongly made by logical positivism (which today has still not a little influence in the social sciences) is that since scientific knowledge is derived in some rigorous way from, and is verified by appeal to observation and experiment, philosophical speculations do not, and should not, find any place in science.(3) According to this view of science, there is therefore no room for metaphysics in scientific inquiry. It is claimed that metaphysical statements are seen to be neither true nor false, but empirically meaningless, so that they are unscientific and have nothing to do with science proper. However, one of the points that has been made clearer as a result of a large number of criticisms against logical positivism is that metaphysical doctrines, as a matter of fact, play an important role in conjunction with scientific inquiry. Metaphysical doctrines, which are statements about the intrinsic nature of things in the universe, are said to be methodologically suggestive, since they tell us about ways of seeing and examining the world.

In addition, it is likewise of considerable importance to recall the intellectual context in which Smith was writing. It is well known that Smith lived at a time when the terms of philosophy and science were interchangeably used without much distinction.(4) A number of Smithian scholars are inclined to understand this fact mainly in a way in which philosophy and science in his day were considered to be disciplines which sought nearly the same type of knowledge. However, such interchangeable use of the terms may imply further that at least up to Smith's time philosophical speculations and scientific activities, despite their different scope and criteria of truth, were considered as part of one chain of thought. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Adam Smith: Natural Theology and Its Implications for His Method of Social Inquiry
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.