Political Orientation, Hostile Media Perceptions, and Group-Centrism

By Stalder, Daniel R. | North American Journal of Psychology, June 2009 | Go to article overview

Political Orientation, Hostile Media Perceptions, and Group-Centrism


Stalder, Daniel R., North American Journal of Psychology


News media play a major role in political campaigns (Hansen & Benoit, 2007). Coupled with the recent increase in perceived divisions between Democrats and Republicans in United States politics (Seyle & Newman, 2006), the issue of fairness in American political news media has understandably come under great scrutiny (Lee, 2005; Morris, 2007). Although some specific news sources are favorably biased toward a particular ideology, the growing number of investigations reveal that the overall news industry is largely balanced (for numerous references on each side, see Eveland & Shah, 2003; Lee, 2005; Morris, 2007). However, media reports commonly contain references to a "liberal press" or a general media bias favoring liberal ideology (Lee, 2005; Watts, Domke, Shah, & Fan, 1999). One potential effect is that people might perceive balanced news coverage as liberally biased (Watts et al., 1999), perhaps especially Republicans or conservatives, as some political pundits and researchers have claimed. In general, one typically perceives the media as biased against one's views, termed hostile media perceptions or the hostile media effect (e.g., Eveland & Shah, 2003; Lee, 2005). However, it is still unclear how Democrats and Republicans compare in their perceptions of media being against their ideological side, in part because of methodological limitations in previous studies.

One general limitation is that previous studies measured perceptions of the media's treatment of a single issue or candidate (as noted by Lee, 2005; see also Gunther & Schmitt, 2004), and not of general political ideologies or groups. Although the difference might seem subtle, it is akin to the difference between mistreatment of an individual and discrimination against the group to which the individual belongs. Among the studies that investigated more general media perceptions as a function of political orientation (Eveland & Shah, 2003; Gunther, 1992; Lee, 2005; Mutz & Martin, 2001; Watts et al., 1999), none showed that Republicans differed from Democrats in perceptions of media hostile to a political ideology or group.

Gunther's (1992) data showed no difference between Democrats and Republicans. Eveland and Shah (2003), Lee (2005), and Mutz and Martin (2001) suggested that Republicans more strongly held hostile media perceptions, but these studies' dependent measures actually did not assess perceptions of media treatment of political ideologies or groups. Lee only assessed general trust in the media (e.g., "to report the news fairly"; p. 49). Eveland and Shah only assessed perceptions of bias against one's views in general (vs. one's political ideology) and noted this limitation. Mutz and Martin measured perceived media treatment of political parties but combined it with other items, which precludes a clear inference about the item of interest. Watts et al. (1999) reported that the conservative "elite" (e.g., candidates and party officials) were more likely than the liberal "elite" to claim a hostile ideological bias in the overall news industry. However, aside from the narrow sample, the researchers did not directly assess media perceptions. Rather, they inferred perceptions or claims from news stories (based on coding), and other data showed that the liberal elite were more likely than the conservative elite to claim a hostile ideological bias in specific media institutions (vs. the overall industry).

The current research tried to establish with more certainty that Republicans are more prone than Democrats to hostile political media perceptions (i.e., perceptions of media being against one's political ideology). Given the potential of such a claim to create additional divisiveness between the two parties, firmly establishing this difference with additional data seems paramount. I tried to improve on previous methods by more directly assessing perceptions of bias toward ideologies (e.g., vs. toward one's personal views). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Political Orientation, Hostile Media Perceptions, and Group-Centrism
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.