Markets, Flexibility, and Family: Evaluating the Gendered Discourse against Pay Equity

By Mutari, Ellen; Figart, Deborah M. | Journal of Economic Issues, September 1997 | Go to article overview

Markets, Flexibility, and Family: Evaluating the Gendered Discourse against Pay Equity


Mutari, Ellen, Figart, Deborah M., Journal of Economic Issues


Many writers on contemporary economic trends seem to agree that we are rapidly entering a new era of flexibility.(1) Yet what flexibility means and whether it is something to be embraced or thwarted is passionately debated, even among institutionalists and other progressives. Three forms of flexibility have been either advocated or implemented to different degrees. The first two, wage and employment flexibility, reassert the central role of supply and demand forces in external labor markets, signaling a return to classical notions of free market equilibrium. Greater wage flexibility has been pursued through labor market deregulation (such as implicitly or explicitly lowering minimum wage standards) and through concession bargaining. Employers' increased use of part-time, temporary, and contingent workers, as well as subcontractors and homeworkers, are all strategies to increase employment flexibility. In the United States, wage concessions, outsourcing, deregulation, and use of contingent labor are also factors contributing to wage polarization [Harrison and Bluestone 1990]. During the 1980s, Europe's relatively higher unemployment rates ("Eurosclerosis") were used by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and other international agencies as a basis for positing the United States as a model of labor market flexibility. European governments, especially the United Kingdom, have pursued deregulation and privatization to promote flexibility in external labor markets as a central policy objective, along with the dismantling of European welfare states [Standing 1991; Curry 1992; Howell 1992; Brodsky 1994; Faux 1995a. 1995b]. The result of such flexibility strategies has been a decline in pay levels and employment security.

A third form, functional (or internal) flexibility, focuses on introducing flexibility within firms and the production process itself. The key element in internal labor flexibility is multi-skilling, which permits employers to reassign workers to various tasks in the production process, consolidating the number of job categories in a firm. Under these systems, job descriptions are relatively open-ended, the length of the working day varies, and team work is emphasized.(2) The OECD began to actively analyze internal labor market flexibility in the late 1980s, and the theme has been picked up by individual governments [see OECD 1989; Carnevale 1991].(3) However, the concept of functional flexibility can be traced to research by institutionalists such as Michael Piore and Charles Sabel [1984], who coined the term flexible specialization to describe an emerging system of industrial relations and organization with the potential to replace mass production. Piore and Sabel advocate flexible specialization, which increases the ability of firms to adapt to changing markets, as an economic response to heightened international competition.(4) In the view of these optimistic proponents of the progressive nature of flexibility, new technologies can benefit workers via a return to craft-oriented production processes, reversing the deskilling and alienation associated with mass production [see also Osterman 1988].

Others writing from a critical perspective view internal flexibility as a complement, rather than substitute, for external flexibility? Functional flexibility increases a firm's reliance upon external labor markets by decreasing the traditional power of workers in unionized, core sectors and by reducing career mobility within internal labor markets [Appelbaum 1987: Standing 1989, 1991; Harrison and Bluestone 1990; Rosenberg 1991; Babson 1995]. While Piore and Sabel depict flexibility as driven by a new structure of demand for specialized, rather than mass-produced goods, critics discern a new employer strategy to wrest control over the labor process from unionized workers. The relationship between flexible specialization and Piore's earlier work on dual labor markets is observed, as James Curry [1992, 111] argues that the new theory recasts the characteristics of secondary labor markets into opportunities rather than problems. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Markets, Flexibility, and Family: Evaluating the Gendered Discourse against Pay Equity
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.