Blair's Scotland: Excitement and Uncertainty

By Kernohan, R. D. | Contemporary Review, December 1997 | Go to article overview

Blair's Scotland: Excitement and Uncertainty

Kernohan, R. D., Contemporary Review

Neither Scotland nor the United Kingdom can ever be the same again after the collapse of the Conservative Government last May, when the Tories lost all their Scottish seats. In the post-election mood it was an all but foregone conclusion that Tony Blair's Government would win the rushed referendum on its plans for a Scottish Parliament, not only for the main proposal but on the 'second question' of limited tax-raising powers for the Edinburgh Assembly. It was so sure of victory that it was even able to time the Scottish referendum to help squeeze a favourable vote at the Welsh one a week later, when a far more limited scheme of devolution won a tiny majority.

In several other areas of policy the 'New Labour' Government scarcely conceals continuity with the Conservatism of John Major and even Margaret Thatcher. Nor can it conceal the uncertainty or vagueness of much of its thinking on what 'modernisation' means in constitutional reforms for the United Kingdom as a whole and English government in particular. In Wales the Labour Party itself remains divided about the proposed Assembly. But in Scotland the departure from Conservative policy is dramatic in its style and unpredictable in its consequences. The uncertainties are now not about what Labour will do but where its policies will lead.

The Conservatives, in the Major years as well as the Thatcher ones, gambled on being able to hold power long enough for Labour to become bored with its comparatively recent enthusiasm for devolution, or frightened by the risks in encouraging a nationalism which it might be unable to control. The Conservatives lost the gamble and Labour now has to face the risks - including the risk that the expectations aroused among many Scots are not those which can be fulfilled by the kind of Parliament now to be provided. Labour has stimulated hopes and, with much media help, has created excitement. Whether it can provide satisfaction remains uncertain.

The many uncertainties and difficulties which Blair's plans now face are those of the long-term evolution of institutions and opinions, not of short-term political practicality. The overwhelming majority which Labour commands in the House of Commons would make Conservative opposition irrelevant and ineffective, even if its force were not reduced by the admission that the next Conservative Government would not abolish what the last one felt bound to resist.

That majority also limits the immediate opportunities for the Scottish National Party to extract more concessions and even for Blair's Liberal allies to protest if Labour has second thoughts about the small print of their concordat on devolution.

The longer-term problems are of four distinct though sometimes interrelated kinds.

The first concerns the effectiveness, even when Labour's White Paper proposals are defined in a Bill and refined during its committee stage, of the proposed division of power between the sovereign United Kingdom Parliament at Westminster and the Edinburgh one, which will have control of matters at present handled through the administratively devolved Scottish Office and the Scottish law officers, as well as bits and pieces acquired from other U.K. Ministries. However the decision that devolution will extend to all powers not specifically reserved inevitably creates uncertainty.

The second arises from uncertainty about whether the political conditions in which the legislative and executive devolution experiment is attempted will encourage the new Parliament to make the most of opportunities and minimise the difficulties.

The third reflects the difficulty of predicting how Scottish opinion, which so clearly favoured devolution at the referendum, evolves after aspirations differing greatly among supporters of a Scottish Parliament in emphasis, coherence, and longer-term intention have been expressed in a defined political system.

The fourth, as difficult to predict, depends on the impact of Scottish devolution on the working of United Kingdom institutions - and on the sense of identity of the English. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Blair's Scotland: Excitement and Uncertainty


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.