Reply: GWDA and UK 2005 Election Results

By Brunsdon, Chris | Geographical Analysis, July 2009 | Go to article overview

Reply: GWDA and UK 2005 Election Results


Brunsdon, Chris, Geographical Analysis


Introduction

This is a short response to some recent queries relating to the example of geographically weighted discriminant analysis (GWDA) applied to U.K. election results in 2005 in a paper I recently published with colleagues (Brunsdon, Fotheringham, and Charlton 2007). The two queries are about the performance of ordinary linear discriminant analysis (LDA) as reported in the paper, as opposed to that obtained using an SPSS analysis, and also the reasons for working with principal components rather than raw data in our reported analysis.

Predictions from the global LDA

As reported in our paper, the discriminant functions in ordinary LDA are based on the values of the predictor variables, the class (in this case the winning party), and the prior probabilities that each class will occur. The latter, in our analysis, was calculated using equation (4) as shown in our paper--for each party, the prior probability (i.e., the probability before any further details are supplied) of any constituency electing a candidate from party i is [p.sub.i], the proportion that this party is elected in the entire data set. In SPSS, two options are offered for the values of [p.sub.i] One is that just stated, and the other is to assign equal prior probabilities to each class--so that if there are m classes (here m = 3) then [p.sub.i] = 1/m. Assigning different values to the [p.sub.i]'s affects the predictions of a model--see equation (8) in our paper (or indeed any standard text on LDA). In our paper, we used priors based on proportions of the overall numbers of classes, that is, the first option previously listed. This specification predicted no Liberal Democrat seats returned. However, using the equal probabilities prior (i.e., [p.sub.i] = 1/3 for all parties) with the supplied Ida' function in R, the results are the same as those from SPSS (also with equal priors), which do perform better than those based on proportional priors.

This is perhaps surprising--since it would be unusual in recent U.K. elections to obtain overall equal proportions of parties (possibly the closest to this in recent years was in 1923)--however, this choice of priors does seem to give better predictions. Interestingly, however, I have now rerun the GWDA using equal priors (rather than proportions of classes according to the data, as in the paper)--with the two principal components used in our paper and obtained the results in Table 1. These suggest that, although global LDA with equal priors outperforms GWDA with proportional priors, GWDA with equal priors outperforms both of these.

Table 1 Running Geographically Weighted Discriminant Analysis with Prior
Probabilities Set to {1/3, 1/3, 1/3}

               Winner

CWDA     Con    Lab   Other  Total

Con      186     20     4     210
Lab        1    278     3     282
Other      9     16    52     77
Total    196    314    59

Working with principal components

Another question raised is the justification of the use of principal components. Therefore, explaining this further may be helpful. First, expressing the model in terms of principal components still allows for the influence of all six "raw" variables. If the initial variables are in a matrix X, then the principal component scores are S(X - m), where S is a matrix whose columns are the eigenvectors of the co-variance matrix of X and m is the vector of the means of the variables in X. If all of the components are required, then 5 is an m x m matrix where m is the number of variables. If the columns are arranged in order of the variance explained, then dropping the last m - k columns of S gives the expression for just the first k components.

Thus, one can write

Z = (X - m) s (1)

where Z is the matrix of component scores. If the linear discriminant function for class i has coefficients (in terms of the principal component model) given by [a.sub.i] then the function (excluding the constant term) is

Z[a. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Reply: GWDA and UK 2005 Election Results
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.