The Family Firm's Exclusion from Business School Research: Explaining the Void; Addressing the Opportunity

By Litz, Reginald A. | Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Spring 1997 | Go to article overview

The Family Firm's Exclusion from Business School Research: Explaining the Void; Addressing the Opportunity


Litz, Reginald A., Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice


The first thing to know about any theory of organizations is that it is rooted in a particular set of assumptions and way of looking at the world. Reading through many of the books labeled Organization Theory or Organizational Behavior you would hardly have noticed that fact: with minor differences, they reflect a similar view of organizations that is based on the notion of fact or universal truth. But these textbooks can not claim to have captured any kind of universal truth. Rather, they market a dominant interpretation of reality. - Mills and Simmons (1995)

Among organizational theorists, the tacit ideological commitment to the notion that efficiency considerations and bureaucratic rationality... should predominate in the workplace often leads researchers to ignore how the family dynamics of the owners influence managerial behavior. - Lansberg, Perrow, and Rogolsky (1988, p.4)

Science advanced, knowledge grew, nature was mastered, but Reason did not conquer and tribalism did not go away. - Issacs (1975, p. 25)

Boyacigiller and Adler (1991) assert that contemporary management research is implicitly biased to reflect the cultural values and assumptions of North American culture. In their review of the parochial outlook apparent in much of contemporary organizational theory, these authors highlight three significant biases apparent in existing research: first, an implicit orientation toward free will; second, a pronounced slant in favor of rugged individualism; and third, a predisposition to devalue the subtle nuances of "high-context" cultures. These authors conclude that the post World War II expansionary climate enjoyed by U.S. managers, as well as the American culture's pronounced bias for ragged individualism and diminished appreciation for contextual subtlety, result in organizational research of severely compromised external generalizability.

Boyacigiller and Adler's analysis is relevant beyond simply international dimensions. More specifically, their critique is also relevant for the study of family-related considerations in business enterprises. Even the most superficial skimming of virtually any leading outlet of theoretical or empirical research provides ready testimony on the paucity of family firm research (Hoy & Verser, 1994). This is surprising since family control has been estimated to be a factor in over 90% of all firms (Beckhard & Dyer, 1983; Lansberg, 1983; Stern, 1986). While there are notable exceptions (Daily & Dollinger, 1992, 1993; Cromie, Stephenson, & Montieth, 1995; see also Davis & Tagiuri, 1985; Aronoff & Ward, 1991; and Sharma, Chrisman, & Chua, 1995 for extensive bibliographies of family firm research), family businesses remain largely omitted from rigorous empirical and conceptual study. As Brockhaus (1994) and Carsrud (1994) have both noted, this has resulted in the terrain being staked by a more anecdotally driven and prescriptively oriented practitioner community. Why is this so, and what are the practical implications of this omission?

In this paper I seek to address these two questions by providing a general inter- and intraorganizational explanation for the large-scale exclusion of family-related issues from academic research. Considered in the explanation are the unique characteristics of family-controlled firms, privately held corporations, university-based business research institutions, and the career aspirations of individual researchers. I also seek to address the additional issue of what special challenges might be associated with family-firm research. Before addressing either, however, I offer a review of recent definitional work on the conceptual distinctives of the family firm. This is provided in order to clarify the unique and enigmatic nature of the family-controlled enterprise.

THE FAMILY FIRM: DEFINITIONAL CLARIFICATION

Handler (1989) noted several important challenges facing family business researchers. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Family Firm's Exclusion from Business School Research: Explaining the Void; Addressing the Opportunity
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.