Misinforming Knowledge through Ontology

By Davey, Bill; Tatnall, Arthur | Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, Annual 2004 | Go to article overview

Misinforming Knowledge through Ontology


Davey, Bill, Tatnall, Arthur, Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology


Introduction

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) has now a recognised ontology modelling language (W3C 2004). Tools exist such as Chimera from Stanford University (Stanford, 2004) that allow us to [perform analysis on ontologies embedded in web sites. These developments allow us to use software agents to deliver meaning rather than flat text. This meaning can come from the web, or from documents within an organisation, analysed through the organization onotology. When we rely on computer systems to support decision making with derived knowledge, the underlying model used by the computer system must be trusted. Systems based on ontology have a serious flaw in that the ontology grows from a seed that defines the breadth of knowledge that can be organised. If this seed (called the bootstrap) includes domain knowledge, but no knowledge of the people working in the domain, then we cannot trust results.

Webster's Dictionary defines ontology as "the branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being, reality, or ultimate substance." However, Abou-Zeid (2003) recognises that, for the AI (artificial intelligence) community what 'exists' is that which can be represented, and ontology from this perspective is "an explicit specification of conceptualization." Knowledge management systems can 'create' knowledge by semantic analysis of a database (often called an 'organisational memory') of data gathered from interactions between members of an organisation and the knowledge management system. To perform such a semantic analysis the knowledge management system must have created a formal language specification of all the concepts used in the organisation. This formal specification of 'what is' for an organisation is the ontology. An illustration taken from software of Sheth, Thacker and Patel (2003) shows this:

Earthquake (latitude, longitude, region,
event Date, description,
damagePhoto,
numberOfDeaths, magnitude);

This definition is of a class that will define the ontological entity earthquake. In this problem domain, whenever the term 'earthquake' is used it must have the parameters: latitude, longitude, region etc and nothing outside this list of parameters has anything to do with earthquakes. By tightly specifying the language of a problem domain we allow the knowledge management system to perform analysis amongst the data captured.

Software to date has been capable of gathering fairly mundane engineering aspects of the processes and operations of organizations. Current research into knowledge acquisition focuses on enriching knowledge capture and creation, and this enrichment requires more sophisticated ontology to underlie the process. What can happen if the ontology is flawed is that analysis is based on oversimplified concepts leading to conclusions that either have little relevance or are flawed as they leave out important factors. This is particularly important when relationships are omitted from an ontology. Imagine a virtual organisation containing two companies; a wine maker in the Barossa Valley and a wine distributor with warehousing in Melbourne and Brisbane. Analysis of captured data from a time and motion study is in the form "shipping to Melbourne will take 24 hours, shipping to Brisbane will take 36 hours" and this is used to make scheduling decisions. In operation the system is found to deliver to Melbourne in 24 hours and to Brisbane in 52 hours. Detailed study of the delivery shows that the trucks going to Brisbane are always loaded last at the winery because a competing company shipping to Brisbane pays more for the wine and is given preference. This class of problem with ontology is due to the difficulty of starting an ontology. Once seeded with useful data an ontology will grow to include all, important factors. The problem is that seeding or 'bootstrapping' of ontologies often ignores whole areas of data, particularly that data to do with relationships between actors. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Misinforming Knowledge through Ontology
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.