The War We Need to Win - Now Let's Be Clear about the Cost; A Mounting Death Toll in Afghanistan Highlights the Failures in Candour across the Political Divide

The Evening Standard (London, England), July 15, 2009 | Go to article overview

The War We Need to Win - Now Let's Be Clear about the Cost; A Mounting Death Toll in Afghanistan Highlights the Failures in Candour across the Political Divide


Byline: Anne McElvoy

THE DEATH toll mounts , the flag-draped coffins come home, young faces look out from the pages of newspapers under their peaked caps and each Prime Minister's Questions session begins with its own anthem for doomed youth.

As the number of servicemen's lives lost in Afghanistan passes the levels of Iraq's fatal casualties on the British side, the question of what we are doing there and for how much longer reverberates loudly through British politics.

This war was greeted, rather oddly if you think about it, with unanimity by the three parties. For some time, there has been very little disagreement at Westminster about the correctness of committing troops to the front line in Afghanistan in the wake of a lengthy engagement in Iraq.

We have lived through a spooky period in which the leaders of all three parties were committed to the war, while many in the public had doubts about it The impact of this summer's offensive on the Taliban is not yet known. But its effect on the home front is there to be seen. Nick Clegg, despite opposing Iraq, firmly supported Afghanistan, but now accuses the Government of lacking a "reasonable goal" and "throwing away lives". Strong stuff. Mr Clegg might one day inform us which lives he thinks were thrown away and which were inevitable consequences of fighting a brutal enemy. One can't always have it both ways, even in the Lib-Dems.

David Cameron raises doubts about the Government's handling of the war, while insisting after every trip to Helmand that he is firmly behind our boys. He has a habit of homing in on particular aspects of wars as a pars pro toto for a proper statement of his own beliefs, in this case the injunction that we should "beg, borrow or frankly steal those helicopters" which would offer greater cover to soldiers on the ground.

Then read his defence spokesman Liam Fox's defence of the intervention in The Times yesterday. Such is Mr Fox's fervour that we would assume the Tories were about to guarantee the spending on better equipment they criticise Gordon Brown for not providing. Alas not. Mr Cameron is defending ringfenced spending on international aid, decoupled from our foreign policy or military objectives and subject to very little scrutiny - while failing to guarantee that he would spend money to equip those in front-line combat against the Taliban. Why, only he can explain.

One of the reasons that the spike in killings of British soldiers in Helmand has caused such an outcry is that the public has been so ill-prepared for a conflict which is by definition likely to be long and cost many lives. Any toll is too high for those who grieve but the point of a fighting army is to fight and sometimes to die - and the numbers as a whole are not huge.

If we really don't want that then let's accept that we will have a smaller army which does less important things. Ultimately, I suppose, it could confine itself to messing about on Salisbury Plain and a bit of light peacekeeping. Is that what we want? The people least keen on such an option are soldiers themselves. So while the risks should not be undersold, the point of an army as capable as Britain's of active participation in major conflicts is that it is able to take on major missions - and is prepared to take the consequences.

"Why are we at war? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The War We Need to Win - Now Let's Be Clear about the Cost; A Mounting Death Toll in Afghanistan Highlights the Failures in Candour across the Political Divide
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.