Federal Performance Reporting: What a Difference Ten Years Males! since CPRA Implementation, the Annual Reporting Quality Has Improved Substantially, and Agencies with Better Reports Increasingly Use Performance Information as a Management Tool

By Ellig, Jerry | The Public Manager, Summer 2009 | Go to article overview

Federal Performance Reporting: What a Difference Ten Years Males! since CPRA Implementation, the Annual Reporting Quality Has Improved Substantially, and Agencies with Better Reports Increasingly Use Performance Information as a Management Tool


Ellig, Jerry, The Public Manager


In 1999--a decade ago--federal agencies issued their first annual performance reports mandated by the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 1993. That same year, the Mercatus Center at George Mason University launched a research project to evaluate the quality of the reports each year. Ten years makes a difference:

* Ten years ago, one agency's report almost filled a copier paper box and weighed 30 pounds. For fiscal year 2008 (FY08), twenty agencies produced brief "citizens' reports" to make their performance results more accessible to the general public; most of these reports were shorter than thirty pages.

* Ten years ago, sixteen agencies made their reports available online, but only four clearly labeled the report as their annual performance report and made it easy to find. For FY08, twenty three reports were available online shortly after they were due to Congress. Thirteen agencies posted their reports on time, created a direct link on their homepage, permitted downloads as both single and multiple files, and provided contact information for questions or comments.

The content of the reports has improved substantially as well, both quantitatively and qualitatively.

By the Numbers

Each year, our researchers examine the reports produced by the twenty-four agencies covered under the Chief Financial Officers (CFO) Act of 1990, which account for the vast majority of federal outlays.

The scoring process evaluates (1) how transparently an agency discloses its successes and failures, (2) how well an agency documents the tangible public benefits it claims to have produced, and (3) whether an agency demonstrates forward-looking leadership that uses annual performance information to devise strategies for improvement. An expert team evaluates each report on twelve criteria--four each for transparency, public benefits, and leadership. On each criterion, the report receives a score that can range from 1 (no useful content) to 5 (best practice that other agencies should adopt). The maximum possible score is 60, and the minimum is 12. An average of 3 points on every criterion yields a score of 36, which could be considered "satisfactory."

Figure 1 shows that average scores have risen by about 15 percent. Some individual agencies improved their reports by much larger amounts. The U.S. Department of Labor's report was the most improved over the decade, rocketing from 36 points and fifth place in FY99 to a record 56 points and first place in FY08. Seven agencies gained more than 10 points between FY99 and FY08: the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), National Science Foundation (NSF), and the Departments of State, Health and Human Services (HHS), Commerce, Justice, and Agriculture. The Department of Homeland Security also increased its score by 13 points since FY04, the first year its report was included in the scorecard.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

These score data understate the full extent of improvement, however, because the research team tightens the scoring criteria over time as new best practices emerge. Our reevaluation of the best four reports from FY99 finds that these reports would rank well below average when judged on the same twelve criteria, but using FY08's higher standards.

Table 1 shows where these FY99 reports would have ranked compared with the reports agencies produced for FY08. Evaluated by FY08 standards, the best FY99 report, from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) would rank just sixteenth in FY08. The three other FY99 reports reevaluated under FY08 standards were from the Departments of Transportation, Veterans Affairs, and Education. All would have done worse under FY08's tighter standards. From these evaluations, we estimate that the average quality of performance reports has improved by about 75 percent since FY99.

Best Practices

Because the Mercatus scorecard explicitly identifies best practices every year, comparing some FY99 best practices with their FY08 counterparts is not difficult. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Federal Performance Reporting: What a Difference Ten Years Males! since CPRA Implementation, the Annual Reporting Quality Has Improved Substantially, and Agencies with Better Reports Increasingly Use Performance Information as a Management Tool
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.