Why Is There So Much Sex in Christian Conservatism and Why Do So Few Historians Care Anything about It?

By Moreton, Bethany | The Journal of Southern History, August 2009 | Go to article overview

Why Is There So Much Sex in Christian Conservatism and Why Do So Few Historians Care Anything about It?


Moreton, Bethany, The Journal of Southern History


SIT DOWN AND BUCKLE YOUR SEATBELTS! WHAT I AM ABOUT TO TELL you will shock and disgust you," ran the e-mail that Georgia state representative Calvin Hill sent to his supporters in February 2009. With the state facing a $2.3 billion budget shortfall, the Republican vice chairman of the House Appropriations Committee alerted his constituents that even during this economic crisis, "your tax dollars are being used at our state universities to pay professors to teach your children classes like 'Male Prostitution' and 'Queer Theory.'" (1) Although it quickly emerged that Representative Hill had mistaken a list of faculty areas of expertise for actual course offerings, he and another Republican representative, Charlice Byrd, took to the airwaves. As CNN reported their support from the Christian Coalition, Hill and Byrd demanded the firing of the faculty members and the cancellation of their classes in order to right this "major misuse of the state university system's budget." (2) When asked about university professors of religion, who far outnumber those with expertise in sexuality, Hill fumbled for a response. On an Atlanta street, a Georgia State University student was more direct: "Me, I'm a Christian," she told a reporter, "and if my mother heard about there are classes about being queer here, she'd probably withdraw me." (3)

As religion scholar Janet R. Jakobsen points out, the antipathy between nonreproductive sex and Christian conservatism has achieved the ultimate ideological goal--that of appearing so self-evident as to pass unexamined. (4) Instead of probing the content, the "culture wars" narrative laments that this presumably timeless relationship was drafted in service to laissez-faire capitalism. And on the surface, the recent move in the Georgia statehouse rehearses the familiar storyline: With its economic model in disarray, the conservative movement of the last thirty years might be expected to fall back on its most reliable hot-button issue. "[W]eary gay Georgians shouldn't be surprised," wrote an Atlanta columnist, that "it was professors studying gay topics that [Hill] singled out" from the extensive expertise guide) Georgia, after all, has been among the hardest hit of the free market's domestic victims. Decades of disdain for public oversight produced a branch bank on every street comer and a frantic level of unscrupulous mortgage lending; in early 2009 the state was leading the nation in the number of troubled banks, by a factor of almost four, and was among the leaders in the extent of foreclosures. (6) In the culture-wars version of the conservative ascendancy, this economic outcome was enabled over two generations by the cynical manipulation of emotional, irrational religious prejudices. By periodically hollering "abortion" or "homosexual agenda," this explanation posits, the godless free marketeers duped the folks in the pews into dismantling their own New Deal protections, thereby forcing American wealth disparities back to nineteenth-century levels and greasing the skids for the wholesale off-loading of middle-class jobs. As Thomas Frank put it in the definitive popular formulation, the rise of the New Christian Right after 1970 is the spectacle of "a French Revolution in reverse--one in which the sans-culottes pour down the streets demanding more power for the aristocracy." (7)

From Jonathan Rieder's landmark 1989 essay on the silent majority to Matthew D. Lassiter's pathbreaking 2006 book of that title, historians have used this paradox to pose productive questions of the recent past. (8) Many have done so with one eye on the clock, wondering when the buzzer will sound halftime on the era of conservative ascendancy. As the scholarly profession anxiously waited for Lefty to return to the national stage, the historical explorations of conservatism evolved to ever more complex forms. One result has been a sort of collective penance for the condescension of the consensus historians of the mid-1960s and their social science allies, who underestimated conservative America by focusing on its radical fringe. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Why Is There So Much Sex in Christian Conservatism and Why Do So Few Historians Care Anything about It?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.