Equivalence and Equations in Early Years Classrooms: Elizabeth Warren, Annette Mollinson and Kym Oestrich Explain How Young Children Can Develop Powerful Understandings of Equivalence and Equations

By Warren, Elizabeth; Mollinson, Annette et al. | Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, Spring 2009 | Go to article overview

Equivalence and Equations in Early Years Classrooms: Elizabeth Warren, Annette Mollinson and Kym Oestrich Explain How Young Children Can Develop Powerful Understandings of Equivalence and Equations


Warren, Elizabeth, Mollinson, Annette, Oestrich, Kym, Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom


Early algebraic thinking in a primary context is not about introducing formal algebraic concepts into the classroom but involves reconsidering how we think about arithmetic. Early algebraic thinking assists young students to engage effectively with arithmetic in ways that support engagement with arithmetic structure rather than arithmetic as a tool for computation.

The distinction between arithmetic thinking and algebraic thinking in the early years' context is best defined as: arithmetic thinking focuses on product (a focus on arithmetic as a computational tool) and algebraic thinking focuses on process (a focus on the structure of arithmetic) (Malara & Navarra, 2003). This distinction assisted us to distinguish between the two in classroom discussions, and to move from one to the other as the need arose.

In our work with young children (5 year-olds), at times we needed arithmetic to support algebraic thinking (e.g., computing two expressions to see if they were the same) while at other times we needed algebraic thinking to support arithmetic (e.g., adding 3 to 2 is the same process as adding 3 to 82, 3 to 1012, 30 to 20).

The power of mathematics lies in the intertwining of algebraic thinking and arithmetic thinking. Each enhances the other as students become numerate (Warren, 2008). Using the distinction between arithmetic and algebraic thinking, a series of hands-on activities were collaboratively planned and implemented. The activities focused on the areas of equivalence and equations. The aim was to assist 5 year-olds to come to an understanding of the structure of equations, and in particular the use of the equal sign. The activities not only encouraged active learning (Crawford & Witte, 1999) but also reflected the principles of socio-constructivist learning (Vygotsky, 1962). In the case of equivalence and equations, many students in their primary years hold misconceptions with regard to the equal sign (Warren & Cooper, 2005). For many an equation only makes sense if the action occurs before the equal sign. For example, when asked to find the unknown for 7 + 8 = ? + 9, many students express this as 7 + 8 = 15 + 9 = 24.

With regards to equivalence in the early years, there are four key areas that students should explore.

1. Developing the comparative language that assists in describing equivalent and non-equivalent situations,

2. Developing an understanding that equals means that the two expressions are equivalent,

3. Representing equations in a variety of different formats including equations with more than one number on the left hand side (e.g., 2 + 5 = 3 + 2 + 2 and 7 = 5 + 2, and

4. Using the 'balance principle' to find unknowns.

Language of equivalence and non-equivalence

Initially these ideas were explored in a numberless world with a focus on developing the language used for describing equivalent situations, namely: "equal to," "same as," "not equal to," and "different from." This was achieved by using concrete objects and focusing on a variety of different attributes such as shape, size and colour. Students were also introduced to balance scales that were balanced when the objects on each side had the same mass. The beginning activities explored comparing two different sets, for example, two stacks of blocks, liquid in two containers, or mass in two sides of the balance scale.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

During the classroom conversations, the language utilised to compare two sets of objects was emphasised. Each group of students was encouraged to explain why the sets were the same or different. The reasons they gave for the use of "same as" with the two stacks of blocks were: "The height of this stack [pointing to the first stack of blocks] is the same as the height of this stack [pointing to the second stack of blocks]. They are the same height. They are equal."

By contrast the group who poured water into two different containers gave the following reason for their choice of the card "different from:" "The amount of water in jar A is different from the amount of water in Jar B. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Equivalence and Equations in Early Years Classrooms: Elizabeth Warren, Annette Mollinson and Kym Oestrich Explain How Young Children Can Develop Powerful Understandings of Equivalence and Equations
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.