Relationships of Media Use and Political Disaffection to Political Efficacy and Voting Behavior

By Pinkleton, Bruce E.; Austin, Erica Weintraub et al. | Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Winter 1998 | Go to article overview

Relationships of Media Use and Political Disaffection to Political Efficacy and Voting Behavior


Pinkleton, Bruce E., Austin, Erica Weintraub, Fortman, Kristine K. J., Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media


The role of the mass media in contemporary political campaigns has generated much debate. Concern exists, in particular, over current campaign tactics and media election coverage as they relate to voter negativism and apathy that some fear threaten the viability of critical democratic processes (e.g., Ansolabehere, Behr, & Iyengar, 1993; Ansolabehere & Iyengar, 1995; Cappella & Jamieson, 1997; Clinger, 1987; Crotty & Jacobson, 1980: Entman, 1989; Gans, 1986; Martz, 1988; Ward, 1995). Scholars and political observers commonly blame the media, and television news in particular, for its sound-bite driven campaign coverage that frustrates voters seeking substantive content. In the same way, negative political advertising is vilified for relying on personal attack and half-truths, allegedly resulting in widespread voter disaffection and apathy.

These accusations tend to be overly general and ignore the complexity of citizen participation in the electoral process. The relationships among media use, political disaffection, and political behavior are based on complex relationships among variables not yet well understood by social scientists. For example, some researchers have suggested that a reliance on mediated campaign information contributes to low political knowledge, voter disgust, and a lack of political participation (Cappella & Jamieson, 1997; Crotty & Jacobson, 1980; Entman, 1989; Gans, 1986). Other scholars, however, have found selective television use to be positively associated with public affairs knowledge and efficacy, and to enhance political participation (McLeod, Glynn, & McDonald, 1983; McLeod & McDonald, 1985). In addition, while critics frequently discuss political disaffection as a general trait, a previous study (Austin & Pinkleton, 1995) has demonstrated that differing aspects of disaffection have a variety of effects on political efficacy, voting intentions, and behavior.

One reason for the inconsistency in research findings is lack of precision regarding the treatment and testing of key variables in the political decision-making process. Global media use measures that treat voters as passive information consumers, for example, tend to mask the role of active individual media use in political decision making (McLeod & McDonald, 1985). In addition, political disaffection appears to be a complex, multi-faceted phenomenon, aspects of which can enhance or dampen voter participation in the electoral process. Finally, much political communication research treats media use as an independent variable predicting political knowledge, dispositions and participation. O'Keefe and Reid-Nash (1987) have suggested scholars need to give more attention to communication variables as independent, intervening and dependent variables.

According to competence-based perspectives on socialization, the socialization process is an interactive process by which individuals strive to develop the ability to function as competent members of society. Thus, citizens are likely to participate in the political process to the extent that they feel their participation can make a difference. This perspective on socialization holds that people interact with the environment rather than react passively to messages. Understanding citizens' motivational processes, therefore, takes on great importance if scholars are to develop an understanding of how individuals use the mass media to develop political competence and the confidence that their efforts can affect the system (i.e., political efficacy). Greater understanding and specificity regarding political disaffection and media use are required. This study attempts to clarify the relationships among specific aspects of political disaffection, media use, and efficacy to better understand their impact on political behavior.

Dimensions of Political Disaffection

Scholars appear to acknowledge, implicitly if not explicitly, different dimensions of disaffection toward politics among the electorate. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Relationships of Media Use and Political Disaffection to Political Efficacy and Voting Behavior
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.