Legal Modesty and Political Boldness: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in Chaoulli V. Quebec

By Bateman, Thomas M. J. | Review of Constitutional Studies, July 2006 | Go to article overview

Legal Modesty and Political Boldness: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in Chaoulli V. Quebec


Bateman, Thomas M. J., Review of Constitutional Studies


I. INTRODUCTION

Canadians consistently tell pollsters that health care is their number one political priority, (1) and health care policy represents one of the most salient and flattering comparisons they make between Canada and the United States. Roy Romanow, Chair of the Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, intoned at the beginning of his final report that in their discussions with him: "Canadians have been clear that they still strongly support the core values on which our health care system is premised--equity, fairness, and solidarity. These values are tied to their understanding of citizenship. Canadians consider equal and timely access to medically necessary health care services on the basis of need as a right of citizenship, not a privilege of status or wealth." (2)

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (3) is the other great icon, a statement not simply of technical rights and interpretive provisions but of fundamental Canadian values, (4) of those threads that bind an otherwise fragmented, multicultural, disputatious political community. So profound has been the Charter's effect on the national consciousness that undergraduate students typically think that the Charter is the constitution. The courts' interpretation of the Charter is often associated (in the public mind, if not always in the case law) with all that is correct and proper: among other things, a woman's access to abortion, (5) laws that make it a crime to promote hatred, (6) the right of same-sex couples to marry, (7) and the provision of publicly funded interpreters for deaf patients seeking medical attention. (8) The least that can be said is that while public support for specific Supreme Court of Canada Charter decisions may waver, diffuse or general support for the Charter and its chief interpreter remains consistently high. (9)

Shocking it was, then, when in Chaoulli v. Quebec (10) the majority of a Supreme Court panel declared invalid a provision of Quebec's health care legislation that prohibited the purchase of private health insurance (PHI). This was not supposed to happen. The Charter is about rights, equality, and fundamental Canadian values; Canadian health care policy is egalitarian, efficient, and not American. The two should thrive in loving embrace. Alas, the Charter, in the hands of careless legal surgeons, became a knife that excised an element of the Canadian health care system that has kept it from the slide into market commodification. This looks like a judicial revolution, led not by the lefties whose victories are decried by the proponents of the Court Party thesis, (11) but instead by the forces of private property rights, neo-liberalism, and the business-friendly policies associated with the Fraser and C.D. Howe Institutes. Everyone was put off balance: the Charterphiliac equality-seekers who have looked to the Charter and the Supreme Court for the advancement of their agenda, and the Charterphobic types on the right who consider the Court captive to a gaggle of grievance groups that see the state as the answer to all problems. (12)

This article suggests that the decision is both narrower and broader than casual observers are likely to conclude. It is tempting to glean from the result that the Court has "discovered" in the Charter an economic right of property redolent of the Lochner (13) era in United States Supreme Court jurisprudence. In fact, the matter was decided on narrower, procedural terms that are traceable to the Court's 1988 decision in Morgentaler. (14) But Chaoulli, though jurisprudentially modest, is nonetheless a politically bold intervention into a sensitive, complex area of social policy and Canadian federalism.

II. THE CHAOULLI DECISION: WAIT LISTS, HEALTH RISKS, AND THE RIGHT TO PERSONAL SECURITY

Chaoulli (15) originated in a motion for a declaratory judgment that Quebec's legislative prohibition on private health insurance was contrary to both Quebec's Charter of human rights and freedoms (16) and the Canadian Charter. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Legal Modesty and Political Boldness: The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in Chaoulli V. Quebec
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen
Items saved from this article
  • Highlights & Notes
  • Citations
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA 8, MLA 7, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Search by... Author
    Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.