Disaffection, Persistence, and Nation: Some Directions in Recent Scholarship on the Confederacy

By Gallagher, Gary W. | Civil War History, September 2009 | Go to article overview

Disaffection, Persistence, and Nation: Some Directions in Recent Scholarship on the Confederacy


Gallagher, Gary W., Civil War History


Thirty years have passed since Emory M. Thomas's The Confederate Nation, 1861-1865 appeared on the historiographical landscape. Some of its themes had been present in his earlier The Confederacy as Revolutionary Experience, and together the two books heralded the emergence of a major figure in the field. (1) Factors weakening the Confederacy loomed larger than evidence of Rebel persistence or strength in the scholarly literature at that time, but Thomas took seriously the idea of national sentiment in the seceding states. When defeat apparently stalked the slaveholding republic in the spring of 1862 and "their national experiment seemed almost a failure, Confederate Southerners began to respond to their circumstances by redefining themselves--or, more precisely, by defining themselves as a national people." The cruel pressures of war obliged them to "define themselves in deeds. Accordingly the Confederacy acted out its national destiny." Destiny took Rebel armies to Appomattox and Durham Station, final stops on a road marked by catastrophic human and material loss, class struggle, debates about civil liberties, and wrangling over a 'Mate rights political philosophy" that gave way as pressures mounted to establish "a centralized, national state." In the end, "ex-Confederates who accepted defeat and reunion were often unable to accept the consequences of being a vanquished people." (2)

David Williams's Bitterly Divided: The South's Inner Civil War traverses much of the same ground as Thomas's work, offering a convenient point of departure to consider the trajectory of recent scholarship on the Confederacy. The author or editor of four previous books dealing with various aspects of Confederate history, Williams complains that generations of historians have emphasized the war "waged with the North" rather than exploring how the "South was torn apart by a violent inner civil war, a war no less significant to the Confederacy's fate than its more widely known struggle against the Yankees." Resolutely focused on that "inner civil war," Bitterly Divided creates an impression of overwhelming internal fracturing that renders the presence of U.S. armies strangely irrelevant. Across a chaotic home front, men and women of the "plain folk" join black and native minorities, arraying themselves against selfish slaveholders who somehow manage to fight a four-year war while also avoiding direct military service. "Most responsible for the Confederacy's creation," the planter class "excused themselves from the draft in various ways, then grew far too much cotton and tobacco and not nearly enough food. Soldiers went hungry, as did their families back home. Women defied Confederate authorities by staging food riots from Richmond, Virginia, to Galveston, Texas. Desertion and draft evasion became commonplace.... Many deserters joined guerrilla bands.... which controlled vast areas of the southern countryside." Native Americans also "increasingly resisted Confederate authority," and African Americans, especially slaves, did their best to undermine the war effort. "From its beginnings, the Confederate cause lacked support from a majority of southerners," concludes Williams, and that, "to a great extent, explains why it was lost." (3)

Two questions come immediately to mind regarding Bitterly Divided. First, does it make a fresh contribution methodologically, evidentially, or analytically? This can be answered with a simple no--though, quite remarkably, a starred review in Publisher's Weekly predicted the book "will be a revelation even to professional historians" because Williams pulls together "the latest scholarship with his own research" to expose "the deep, often murderous divisions in Southern society." With Williams's "long overdue work" at hand, enthused this individual, "the history of the Civil War will never be the same again." (4) Bitterly Divided cites no manuscripts, includes fewer than ten references to the Official Records, quotes from only a handful of other published primary materials, and relies overwhelmingly on secondary materials that emphasize Confederate disaffection. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Disaffection, Persistence, and Nation: Some Directions in Recent Scholarship on the Confederacy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.