Lie Detection: A Changing of the Guard in the Quest for Truth in Court?

By Ellenberg, Cooper | Law and Psychology Review, Annual 2009 | Go to article overview

Lie Detection: A Changing of the Guard in the Quest for Truth in Court?


Ellenberg, Cooper, Law and Psychology Review


I. INTRODUCTION

Throughout history, human beings have sought to develop more effective methods of lie detection. (1) Lie detection remains a particularly important issue for members of the legal, criminal justice, and medical communities. (2) Courts, however, have been wary to allow recent methods of scientific lie detection into evidence. (3) Lately, scientists have started using more technologically sophisticated methods, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), to detect lies and deception. (4) In fact, some scientists believe it is at least possible that continued development of current techniques, such as fMRI, could result in methods accurate enough to be used in court. (5)

Interestingly, while scientists are working toward more accurate lie and deception detection technology, statisticians are beginning to research the accuracy of jury verdicts. (6) One study suggests that jury verdicts may be inaccurate more often than one would readily believe. (7) Given that lie detection technology is conceivably going to become more accurate, and also that jury verdicts may be inaccurate more often than once thought, some important questions are raised. What role should lie detection technology play in the courtroom as it reaches new levels of accuracy? Could advanced lie detection technology, like fMRI, replace the jury? What impact would highly accurate deception detection have on law and society? This note will directly address the developments in lie detection methods and recent research into jury verdict accuracy. It will then discuss the possible impacts of advanced, highly accurate lie detection on law and society.

II. THE DEVELOPMENT OF LIE DETECTION

A. Early Methods

Most early methods for discerning whether a subject was lying or telling the truth were hardly scientific at all. (8) Early techniques were based on magical and religious beliefs, and did not favor the individual accused. (9) For instance, one medieval method required the accused to walk across hot coals, and if he was burned, he was considered guilty of lying. (10)

A greater emphasis was placed on scientific reasoning during the Renaissance, and confronting and cross-examining witnesses became favored methods of lie detection. (11) Various other approaches developed over time as well, including phrenology in the 18th century. (12) Phrenology is the study of the shape of the skull and its relation to character traits. (13) However, phrenology was short-lived due to "its lack of scientific evidence." (14)

In 1991, an experiment was conducted where groups were asked to assess whether a subject was lying based on "facial, vocal and behavioral cues." (15) In most instances, the groups were not "significantly better than chance at accurately detecting liars." (16) Psychiatrists, however, have identified some methods of identifying deceptive behavior which analyze facial expressions, eagerness to discuss illness, and faked symptoms, but their methods are also limited in capacity. (17) Other methods that have been used include handwriting analysis (graphology), hypnosis, and "truth serums." (18) U.S. courts, however, generally do not admit graphology analysis into evidence, (19) and the Supreme Court has found confessions induced by drugs to be unconstitutional. (20) Hypnosis's value as a lie detector is also questionable because it is primarily designed to aid the subject's ability to recall information rather than discovering when the subject is deliberately concealing it. (21)

There are several other psychological and neuropsychological tests including the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory/-2, Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms, Test of Memory Malingering, and the Validity Indicator Profile that are used by forensic experts to evaluate when subjects are lying. (22) However, "[t]hey are in no way definitive, and on their own, are not admissible as proof of lying. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Lie Detection: A Changing of the Guard in the Quest for Truth in Court?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.