Camus, Sartre and the Algerian War

By Cohen-Solal, Annie | Journal of European Studies, March-June 1998 | Go to article overview

Camus, Sartre and the Algerian War


Cohen-Solal, Annie, Journal of European Studies


Between Camus and Sartre, the Algerian war is a fertile ground for all kinds of paradoxes. If, as Roland Dumas put it, the war was really 'Sartre's war',(1) nothing had, a priori, prepared the philosopher for his role as the conflict's leading intellectual: neither his ignorance of the specific problems of French colonialism in Algeria nor his late and incidental involvement in the conflict. His visit to the M'Zab as a tourist with Simone de Beauvoir in 1950 had a political purpose: 'We were against the colonialist system', wrote De Beauvoir upon their return, 'but we had no a priori prejudice against the local administrators or those in charge of building the roads.'(2) Then, later, when the first voices of opposition rose against the French colonial regime in 1956, Sartre joined his voice to those of others like Jeanson, Barrat, Mandouze, Cesaire, Mascolo and Amrouche. He did so, as we shall see, in his own way, without initiating his meetings: joining in the protest was then the full extent of his activism. It was after his disagreements with Francis Jeanson - from November of 1956 to the spring of 1959 - that he returned to the front lines and progressively switched to a stronger activism. 1960 was, in this respect, his most important year, the year of a full-time political agenda, perhaps the most intense year of his life. That year, he became a French counter-ambassador, visiting Cuba, Brazil, Yugoslavia and the USSR as the official guest of several heads of state - such as Castro, Tito and Khrushchev. It was that year, too, when, after lending his support to the organizers of the Algerian FLN, he became the herald of a large fraction of the left wing's intelligentsia: the scapegoat of the reactionary right. 'Sartre to the firing squad!' shouted the right-wing extremists in October of that year. 'One does not send Voltaire to jail', was General de Gaulle's symbolic response a couple of months later.

Paradoxically, while Sartre's stature gained a wider prominence in what was to be the first of his many 'third world' political causes, that of Camus retreated. For if Camus was the great missing figure of the Algerian war, this was yet a greater paradox. We can hardly forget that the child of Belcourt had first-hand experience of the tensions and pains of the working-class neighbourhoods of this Algiers suburb, that, as early as 1935, he had joined the Algerian Communist Party, that he was the author of an acclaimed series of articles as a field correspondent in 1939 and that these articles, entitled 'Kabylia's Misery' remain the most insightful and thoroughly documented testimony of the situation in Algeria at the time. Camus was familiar with every aspect of the political, cultural and social environment upon which the tensions facing the Algerian people had built up; he was always keen to discuss these topics as a journalist, as a novelist, and as a moralist.

How, therefore, can we explain his strange withdrawal from the political stage as soon as the war broke out in Algeria? His first withdrawal was political: 'My Algeria hurts', he said, simply, on 1 February 1955, never to comment on the situation again except on rare occasions in 1956 and 1957, and always with obvious uneasiness. His final withdrawal was soon to follow with the fatal accident that took his life on 4 January 1960, only a few months before the much publicized trials, manifestos and public demonstrations mobilized the left.

The Algerian war was thus a missed opportunity for Sartre and Camus. In November 1954, what were then euphemistically referred to as the 'Algerian events' had erupted: this was two years after the two writers had made their political disagreements public. They would never speak to each other again, at least explicitly, until Camus's death, and 1952 was to remain the year of their last exchange, of their last public confrontation. Yet their position on the Algerian war, or at least, the opposite sides which they were quickly presumed to have joined, their public antagonism - particularly, as we shall see, in 1957 - had more to do with misunderstandings than a genuine opposition: what a sad fate their friendship had met, with this permanent stalemate, this silence and these irreconcilable disagreements! …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Camus, Sartre and the Algerian War
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.