Why Baseball Needs New York to Just Say No

By Rosentraub, Mark S.; Cagan, Joanna et al. | The Nation, August 10, 1998 | Go to article overview

Why Baseball Needs New York to Just Say No


Rosentraub, Mark S., Cagan, Joanna, deMause, Neil, The Nation


THE YANKEES CAN AFFORD $500 MIL FOR A NEW STADIUM--AND THEY DON'T EVEN NEED ONE.

All of baseball is watching the New York Yankees, and not just because, with an extraordinary first-half start, they're on track to set a major league record this season with 122 victories. A more mundane drama--one that since 1982 has been played out in cities across America to the rune of $5 billion in taxpayer money--is unfolding, as George Steinbrenner joins the long line of team owners who have held up their city governments for new facilities. Steinbrenner wants to leave legendary Yankee Stadium in the Bronx for a site in Manhattan that might cost more than $1 billion to develop. Short of that, he's threatened to move the team to New Jersey or anywhere else that will insure him bigger profits. In early July he threw down the gauntlet to Bronx Borough President Fernando Ferrer, saying, "If he can guarantee we'll get 3 million [in 1998 attendance], then I'll sit down and talk about the Bronx," to which Ferrer dutifully responded with suggestions for ways the City of New York could buy up hundreds of thousands of tickets to make George's day.

This kind of bluster by team owners and scared-rabbit responses from city officials is nothing new. But, as with so many things, New York is different. The Yankees are the richest team in baseball. Even playing in their supposedly antiquated ballpark, they earned $28 million more than any other team in Major League Base ball (MLB) in 1996, the last year for which complete data are available. Their twelve-year, $500 million cable and TV contract, the biggest in history for a sports franchise, means they make huge amounts of money even if attendance does not reach the "magic" 3 million level (which makes Steinbrenner's challenge to Ferrer particularly disingenuous). With the revenue they generate right now, the Yankees can pay more for players than any other team. In fact, when baseball teams in most other cities demand new ballparks, a driving force is the need to earn more to compete with the Yankees for the best players. The Baltimore Orioles, Colorado Rockies, Texas Rangers and Cleveland Indians each demanded a stadium to earn sufficient revenue to attract the same number of high-quality players as the Yankees. Each team received sweetheart deals that saddled taxpayers with hundreds of millions of dollars of additional taxes, but none of those teams earn as much as the Yankees. And this is why whatever New York does will affect taxpayers and baseball fans everywhere. If voters in the New York region can restrain their elected leaders from giving the Yankees a subsidy, other teams will have less need to demand more welfare. In addition, New York can save baseball's competitiveness by saying no, since an even wealthier, subsidized Yankees team could rob other cities of their stars and thus weaken the game.

And there is something more. True, with revenues that already dwarf those of every other team, the Yankees do not need a new stadium. But if they do want a new stadium--and no one has ever analyzed this before--the revenue potential from a new ballpark is so large that without any public money, the Yankees could afford to finance a stadium that costs as much as $500 million and still make a profit of from $7 million to $32 million a year.

Before going into specifics, one question must be answered. Why do frugal taxpayers and conservative politicians agree to give teams subsidies? The sports leagues are monopolies, and they can demand subsidies by insuring that the number of teams is always less than the number of cities that want one. Those without teams dangle subsidies to convince teams to move, and those with teams provide subsidies to avoid losing franchises. Also, by limiting both the number of teams in large markets and revenue sharing, the leagues guarantee that teams in smaller markets are always at an economic disadvantage. Smaller-market teams then demand subsidies to generate sufficient revenue to compete with big-market teams for players. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Why Baseball Needs New York to Just Say No
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.