Interview: John Edmonds: "We're Going Back to Being Trade Unionists." and There Will Be Trouble If the Politicians Don't Take Note

By Richards, Steve | New Statesman (1996), September 11, 1998 | Go to article overview

Interview: John Edmonds: "We're Going Back to Being Trade Unionists." and There Will Be Trouble If the Politicians Don't Take Note


Richards, Steve, New Statesman (1996)


If the mood of John Edmonds is anything to go by, next week's TUC conference in Blackpool will have more political spice than in recent years. Ministers will be greeted warmly, certainly, but there will be palpable tensions.

Edmonds, who is president of the TUC this year as well as being general secretary of the GMB, the third largest union, personifies this ambiguity. His tone, bombastic on the conference platform, is conciliatory and reflective in conversation and yet by the end of the interview he has declared his opposition to most aspects of government economic policy, warned that ministers' approach to public sector pay is heading for a bloody finale reminiscent of a Greek tragedy, and has blown apart traditional perceptions of Messrs Blair, Brown and Mandelson.

This is softly spoken conversation with a hard edge.

His first answer to a general question about relations between trade unions and government is a good example. Edmonds wants to be upbeat, so he praises the access he and other trade-union leaders enjoy. But there is a caveat: at times there seems little point in meeting because there is no hope of persuading them to change course.

"Contrary to the ill-informed press comment we have regular meetings with the Prime Minister. The access is very good. And of course we meet other senior ministers regularly as well. But my impression is that, in a way which is unusual in British politics, this is a government absolutely determined to fulfil its manifesto in a very precise way. So trying to change policy in all those areas included in the manifesto is a waste of time and energy."

Such as? "The undertaking about income tax is a good example. Many of us believe that the refusal to put up income tax for high earners was a bad mistake, forcing the government away from fiscal measures and placing a higher priority on interest rates, what John Smith called a one-club policy. It's a very big mistake, but in a sense there's no point arguing about it because it's clear-cut and is not going to be amended, however compelling the economic arguments."

These exchanges are also clouded by ministerial suspicion about the motives of the trade-union leaders, according to Edmonds. They are there as representatives of the workforce, he insists, with no wider agenda. "We have real difficulty convincing senior ministers that what we care about is the workplace. They see us most of the time in the context of our relationship to the Labour Party and within the party. They are afraid that we are playing politics all the time behind the scenes, but we're actually straight and up front."

But however much the unions' formal ties with the Labour Party complicate their dealings with the government, Edmonds remains committed to the link. "I strongly oppose severing the link as it would mean the creation of a new political party."

This seemed a curious response, since the architects of new Labour have argued openly that they have created a new political party. "Well, they're wrong. I meet party members and see how they vote in NEC elections and so on. It's difficult to sustain that argument if you're talking about the membership at large where the instincts and values are very much the same as they've always been."

And the unions still hold 50 per cent of the votes at the party conference, which, Edmonds insists, works to the party leadership's advantage. In making this point, he underlines the current strategy of the TUC, which is to be largely supportive of the government in the hope that when dissent is expressed ministers act. "Our 50 per cent vote is still a powerful weapon and no one should underestimate its usefulness to the leadership. We work to an unwritten code, if you like, that we underplay our power and that our first instinct is to support the leadership. We know the damage caused by divisions.

"So for trade unions in a concerted way to oppose the leadership is a very, very important signal. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Interview: John Edmonds: "We're Going Back to Being Trade Unionists." and There Will Be Trouble If the Politicians Don't Take Note
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.