The Struggle against Absolutism

By Marshall, Michael | The World and I, October 1998 | Go to article overview

The Struggle against Absolutism

Marshall, Michael, The World and I

The twentieth century could accurately be described as the century of the totalitarian temptation. The greatest conflict of all time was waged in the middle of the century to crush the forces of fascism and national socialism. The other great totalitarian movement, communism, constrained from without by the democratic nations of the world, collapsed undeniably under the weight of its internal contradictions. As far as a political model with global appeal is concerned, democracy has been left holding the field. This did not seem the most likely result in the 1920s and '30s.

Indeed, from the middle of the millennium, with the appearance of nationstates in Europe in the sixteenth century, until the latter half of this century it seemed probable that some form of absolutism would be the dominant pattern for the most powerful and successful of those states. The triumph of societies based upon limited forms of government over their absolutist rivals is one of the most surprising and significant developments of the millennium.

The Anglo-American contribution to the development of the idea and forms of limited government has been immense. Most of the significant steps in that history were taken in Britain or the United States. In the main article of our millennium series, historian Bruce Frohnen gives an account of those steps.

In this essay, I want to set those developments in a wider context. In the first half of the millennium, absolutism was not a problem in Europe. The popes and the Holy Roman emperors made claims to a universal authority and quarreled both in the realm of ideas and in political practice over their relative positions in the universal scheme. But the reality was that neither they nor any other ruler had the means to systematically impose their will on their nominal subjects that the Roman Empire or the contemporary Chinese emperor enjoyed.

Europe in the first half of the millennium was decentralized, and effective power was, for the most part, wielded locally. Authority was underpinned by an amalgam of church teaching, local feudal customs, and the prowess in war of the local lord. Kings were primus inter pares, first among equals, not much more powerful than their barons and always at risk from an overmighty subject. Conflicts among feudal lords were endemic, and kings could not stand above that conflict.

Within this decentralized society were elements that later could become institutionalized to provide a bulwark against absolutist rule. The distinct character of western Europe originated in the marriage of Christianity and the Germanic tribes of northern Europe that flooded over the former boundaries of the Roman Empire.

The contribution of Christianity to the mix was profound and wide-ranging. Professor Frohnen writes about the limits placed upon secular power by the concept of divine law to which the ruler must be subject. The Germanic tribes, however, were not passive partners in the union. Their contribution came primarily in the form of the tribal customs that chieftains had to respect. These customs were the root of the common-law tradition that developed in England and from there influenced American approaches to law and government.

The appearance of nation-states in the sixteenth century was accompanied and made possible by the development of centralized bureaucracies and standing armies that gave rulers considerable power to enforce their will and collect taxes more effectively. The dominant states in Europe from this period on were run on more centralized and absolutist lines.

Louis XIV established a powerful monarchy in France in the seventeenth century. He famously declared: "L'etat c'est moi" ("I am the state"), starting an association of state power with the person wielding it that culminated in the cult of personality of a Hitler, Stalin, or Mao in this century. While Britain was laying the foundations of her powerful overseas empire, her main role in Europe was to act as a check upon the imperial ambitions of its most powerful state--first France and later Germany. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

The Struggle against Absolutism


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.