Role of Abortion in Fertility Control

By Streatfield, Peter Kim | Journal of Health Population and Nutrition, December 2001 | Go to article overview

Role of Abortion in Fertility Control

Streatfield, Peter Kim, Journal of Health Population and Nutrition

The subject of this commentary is the complex interrelationship between abortion and contraceptive use in the control of fertility. While both are interventions designed to manage unwanted pregnancy, there are significant differences between the 'preventive' and 'curative' approaches. The significance stems from abortion being a procedure that provokes fundamental and contentious questions about human life, such as when life begins, as well as highlighting the rights of the mother versus the rights of the foetus, and the obligation of governments to protect the unborn child (1).

There is sufficient historical evidence to conclude that no societies have achieved low fertility without recourse to use of some form of contraception together with abortion. So, an important and topical question that arises from this inter-relationship is whether the provision of high-quality contraceptive services can reduce or substitute for abortion. A recent Lancet article based on data from the ICDDR,B fieldsite in Matlab supports the substitution argument, at least in the context of Bangladesh (2). These findings are discussed below.

A broader related issue here is whether all societies passing through the demographic transition follow a similar pattern. Such a pattern might hypothetically involve an initial stage where growing awareness of the concept of fertility regulation results in increasing contraceptive use and increasing use of abortion simultaneously, and fertility levels decline from high to intermediate levels. In the second stage of the fertility transition, contraceptive practice becomes more widespread and more efficient (reflected in fewer contraceptive failures), and the resort to abortion decreases, although it may never be completely eliminated.

This hypothesis assumes that the majority of couples would prefer to prevent unwanted pregnancies through contraceptive use rather than through abortion. An alternative hypothesis might be that if abortion is freely accessible, couples would have little incentive to practise responsible contraception. This raises the question of whether the balance between use of abortion and use of contraception depends on the availability of these two interventions.

It is instructive to review what the experiences of developed countries--both European and Asian--reveal about this issue of the balance between these two interventions. In fact, several patterns have been described by Potts et al. in their classic text (3). In periods of economic hardship in the late 19th and early to mid-20th centuries, a number of Western and Northern European countries, the United States, and Australia, experienced fertility declines nearly to replacement level well before effective modern contraception was available. The mechanism included resort to illegal abortion and remarkably effective use of inherently-inefficient contraceptive methods, such as withdrawal (coitus interruptus), in a social context of nuclear families and late marriage.

In the more eastern countries of Western Europe, such as Romania and Bulgaria, the effective practice of withdrawal had never been widespread, and abortion played the dominant role. In the former USSR--the first country to permit legal abortion (in 1920)--up to 3 of 4 pregnancies were being aborted, at least in Moscow. However, this pattern was not confined to the period prior to the availability of modern contraceptives. In the early 1960s, there were 14 abortions for every delivery in the largest obstetric hospital in Romania. As occurred earlier in the former USSR, the Romanian government restricted the liberal abortion law in 1966. Unfortunately, they also simultaneously restricted access to modern contraception. Consequently, the birth rate tripled from 13 to 40 per 1,000 in less than one year. As is often the case, the restrictive law was bypassed, and skyrocketing resort to illegal abortion brought the birth rate back to 20 within two years. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

Role of Abortion in Fertility Control


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.