Seven Dirty Words: Did They Help Define Indecency?

By Demas, Jeff | Communications and the Law, September 1998 | Go to article overview

Seven Dirty Words: Did They Help Define Indecency?


Demas, Jeff, Communications and the Law


This article examines the historical perspective of the U.S. Supreme Court case involving the Federal Communications Commission and Pacifica radio station WBAI. Much of the history of this case has been written with respect to its impact on free speech and broadcast "indecency." Through interviews and examination of the Supreme Court opinion, and other writings of the time, this article attempts to answer the questions (1) did the test case help the FCC define indecency; and (2) why, given the trivial nature of this particular complaint, did the Supreme Court see fit to grant certiorari? The author concludes that Pacifica provided a very narrow definition of indecency, although some of its language still serves as precedent.

It took seven words, one complainant, seven commissioners, two litigants, three court of appeals judges, a host of amicus curiae participants, nine Supreme Court justices, four opinions, and nearly five years to determine the fate of a twelve-minute broadcast aired by a noncommercial radio station in 1973. The decision was rebuked by the electronic media as a severe blow to First Amendment protection for broadcasters, and heralded by Morality in Media and its advocates as the beginning of an end to indecent language on the airwaves.(1)

Yet FCC v. Pacifica Corp., which came to be known as the "seven dirty words" case, evolved from a single complaint filed to the FCC, after which no penalties were imposed and no fines levied. In fact, the FCC's response was tantamount to the proverbial principal telling the child upon his first offense that "this will go on your permanent: record."

The FCC declaratory order said that the complaint would be "associated with the station's license file, and in the event subsequent complaints are received, the commission will then decide whether it should utilize any of the available sanctions it has been granted by the Congress."(2)

It began on October 30, 1973, at 2 P.M., when station WBAI in New York City broadcast a recorded monologue given by comedian George Carlin entitled "Filthy Words." A man driving with his son in the car filed a complaint. Acting on the complaint, the FCC issued a declaratory order containing the words mentioned in the previous paragraph. The order was challenged by Pacifica Corporation (owners of WBAI) and was reversed by the D.C. Court of Appeals. In 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the court of appeals' ruling, letting the FCC order stand.(3)

These facts are well documented in many law and mass communications texts, and are probably the subject of discussion in most courses that examine the First Amendment. But there are lesser-known facts about this case that would lead one to wonder why this case made it to the Supreme Court. This article examines those facts and attempts to determine (1) why the Supreme Court granted certiorari to hear this case; and (2) whether this case helped define "indecency" as the FCC apparently had intended. An interview with the chief legal counsels of both parties is central in shedding new light on these questions.

I. HISTORY

To better understand why this case was important to all parties concerned despite the absence of any penalty, it is necessary to review several events that preceded the WBAI broadcast. In the early 1970s, a new genre of programs, known as "topless radio," began to appear on radio stations all over the country. These programs were so called because they dealt explicitly with topics such as sex and pornography. The first station to receive a fine for such a broadcast was Philadelphia's WUHY-FM in 1970. The station paid what it termed a "token forfeiture" of $100.(4) Although WUHY aired what the Commission considered indecent speech, no further action was taken in the case, and the Commission still was lacking a clear definition of indecency.

Three years later WGLD-FM of Oak Park, Illinois, was fined $2000 for airing a broadcast that the FCC termed "obscene or indecent. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Seven Dirty Words: Did They Help Define Indecency?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.