Ambush Marketing: Criminal Offence or Free Enterprise?

By Leone, Luisa | The International Sports Law Journal, July-October 2008 | Go to article overview

Ambush Marketing: Criminal Offence or Free Enterprise?


Leone, Luisa, The International Sports Law Journal


1. Introduction

Sport sponsorship is big business. Major sporting events attract large sponsorship fees and, as a result, a high risk of ambush marketing. The term 'ambush marketing' is an expression invented by its critics, hence the pejorative label for what in many cases is a form of marketing activity which simply refers or alludes to an event, without suggesting any form of official endorsement from or relationship with the event organisers. Other forms of marketing activity might indeed go further and aim to imply some form of association with the event (without making any clear misrepresentations or involving any infringement of another's intellectual property rights). But are all these forms of ambush marketing bad, as the term 'ambush marketing' seems to suggest? From the perspective of the event owners ambush marketing is wrong because it threatens their ability to retain top-paying sponsors. Similarly, for the official sponsors ambush marketing is undesirable because it increases the risk to their investment. For the ambusher, on the other hand, ambush marketing is an important commercial tool and a natural result of free competition.

Outside the sporting context, ambush marketing or simultaneous marketing campaigns are perfectly legitimate marketing activities, regarded as part of the cut and thrust of normal commerce. Take in-store promotions: manufacturers will pay large sums to secure some form of exclusivity in-store only to find this exclusivity undermined by a rival. No one would suggest that such 'ambushes' should be banned. Even within the sporting context, we find that ambush marketing has had some respectable supporters over the years. Major brand-owning companies such as PepsiCO, Nike, Fuji, Kodak, Wendy's and Qantas have all engaged in it. Many companies who opposed ambush marketing for events which they officially sponsored have engaged in the practice themselves at other events.

In recent years, however, there has been a trend towards outlawing ambush marketing. I would argue that this trend benefits neither sport nor the wider economy. Of course, no one would dispute that any marketing campaign which misleadingly suggests that the company behind the campaign is an official sponsor of an event should be unlawful, as should any marketing campaign which fails to respect another company's intellectual property rights, or is libelous or in breach of contract. But the opponents of ambush marketing are not content with such legal safeguards, which are already available to them. What the anti-ambush marketing lobby want is to ban all marketing which refers or alludes to the event in question, even if it does not suggest any form of official sponsorship or privileged relationship.

2. Some well-known examples of ambush marketing

Before considering the arguments for and against ambush marketing in greater depth, it is worth recalling a few well-known examples of ambush marketing.

* The American Express advertising campaign in the Visa-sponsored 1994 Lillehammer Winter Olympics, featured the slogan "If you are travelling to Lillehammer, you will need a passport, but you don't need a visa!"

* At a press conference before the men's 100 metres final at the 1996 Olympics Games, Linford Christie, the defending champion, arrived wearing the unforgettable electric blue contact lenses with a white Puma logo in the centre of each lens. Reebok was the official sponsor, but Linford Christie got more coverage that day than any of the medal winners.

It is not always easy to identify an ambush marketing activity. The European Sponsorship Association has highlighted the following as examples of activities where the position is not so clear:

* sponsoring media coverage of the event, without being an event sponsor;

* a team sponsor issuing branded messages of support for their team when the team is taking part in an event where the team sponsor is not the event sponsor;

* running generic football themed campaigns during the period of a major international football tournament (for example, the notable case of Lufthansa painting footballs on its aircraft during the 2006 World Cup). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Ambush Marketing: Criminal Offence or Free Enterprise?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.