Connecticut Supreme Court Mandates That Juries Generally Be Informed of the Risks Inherent in Eyewitness Identification Procedures When the Eyewitness Has Not Been Warned That the Perpetrator May Not Be Present

Developments in Mental Health Law, January 2006 | Go to article overview

Connecticut Supreme Court Mandates That Juries Generally Be Informed of the Risks Inherent in Eyewitness Identification Procedures When the Eyewitness Has Not Been Warned That the Perpetrator May Not Be Present


A unanimous Connecticut Supreme Court has crafted a jury instruction that generally must be given in trials when an eyewitness identification is entered into evidence. The court noted that psychological studies document that a witness is more likely to misidentify an innocent individual as the perpetrator of a crime during an identification procedure (e.g., during a photo array or lineup) where the witness is not warned that the perpetrator might not be present. The court added the research also shows that warning the witness that the perpetrator might not be present does not significantly decrease the percentage of correct identifications.

The procedure used in this case was described as a "street show-up" where the victim of a crime, while sitting in a police cruiser in a well-lit setting twenty minutes after having been attacked, was asked to observe five handcuffed suspects and to indicate whether any of them had attacked him. In reviewing a subsequent identification, the court noted that several factors are to be considered in determining whether an identification is reliable, including the victim's opportunity to view the criminal and degree of attention at the time of the crime, the accuracy of the victim's prior description of the criminal, the level of certainty demonstrated at the identification, and the amount of time between the crime and the identification. Although the court cited psychological research that indicates that (1) there is a poor correlation between the expressed level of certainty in an identification and its accuracy and (2) a witness' level of confidence is malleable and susceptible to cues from the administrator of the identification procedure, the court determined that these studies were not sufficient to require a change in the test used to ascertain the reliability of an eyewitness identification procedure. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Connecticut Supreme Court Mandates That Juries Generally Be Informed of the Risks Inherent in Eyewitness Identification Procedures When the Eyewitness Has Not Been Warned That the Perpetrator May Not Be Present
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.