A World without End: Jonathan Clark, Editor of a Major New History of the British Isles, Considers What Effect the Intellectual Currents of Our Own Time Have Had on the Way Historians Write

By Clark, Jonathan | History Today, January 2010 | Go to article overview

A World without End: Jonathan Clark, Editor of a Major New History of the British Isles, Considers What Effect the Intellectual Currents of Our Own Time Have Had on the Way Historians Write


Clark, Jonathan, History Today


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

'All poetical lives, unless they are cut off in midstream at a happy juncture, end in failure, because that is the nature of politics and of human affairs.' So wrote the British politician and classicist Enoch Powell in his strangely insightful biography of his inspired Birmingham predecessor Joseph Chamberlain, published in 1977. These words were widely remembered, since their bleak realism contradicted still-widespread assumptions that political careers are high-minded stories of cumulative achievement: the greater the 'statesman', the greater the achievements.

Today we ask whether we must say something similar about historical writing itself. Never has so much history been written; never has its shelf-life been so short; never have its goalposts been so frequently moved; never have historians complained more of the lack of a single national debate on central themes; never has there been less agreement about what is to be explained. The sense of cumulative research yielding reliable and durable results has been undermined. Instead, historians seem to be people whose best skills are in shooting down the theories of other historians.

Editing A World by Itself: A History of the British Isles (Heinemann) leaves me acutely conscious of the transience of all historical endeavour and the scale of our presumption in attempting so impossible a task. Its six authors--James Campbell, John Gillingham, Jenny Wormald, William D. Rubinstein, Robert Skidelsky and myself--will be denounced for our pains, no doubt justifiably, and our chapters will strive to maintain their currency in the ongoing flood of new scholarship. This is, in part, as it should be. Yet editing this collaborative work and writing one of its sections has forced me to sum up what the intellectual currents have been within which we worked and to locate our project in relation to them. Monograph studies of a year, an episode, an individual or a theme can get by without such self-doubts. But to cover the history of the British Isles over 2,000 years means that the larger problems stand out. Within what developing questions, then, have we written?

One cannot deny that powerful causes have inhibited attempts to write such a survey in recent decades. Even 50 years ago it seemed much easier. In the mindset now labelled modernism, the categories of explanation were unquestionable; all outcomes were over-determined; and counterfactual possibilities were dismissed with indignation by historians at contrasting points on the spectrum from E.H. Carr to Geoffrey Elton. Causes were understood to be arranged in a hierarchy of efficacy, with 'underlying causes' the most powerful of all. General surveys over long time-spans were therefore easier and commanded respect. Today, people defending such positions are clearly an embattled minority and my fellow authors are not among them. We appreciated that we were navigating uncharted waters. What, exactly, were their hazards?

First, we were uneasy about the modernist assumption that events always followed the most probable course. In this volume, our ideas about plausible counterfactuals have therefore been set out explicitly. Not many of the old certainties survive: few things now look likely, except perhaps the loss of French lands in the Hundred Years War and economic growth after 1815. But the events of 1066, the Reformation, 1688, 1715 and 1745, 1776, 1832, 1914 and 1939 all now seem to be confused and chaotic, episodes of which the last thing that can be said is that they unfolded on their merits. Even population growth cannot now be taken for granted. Where the old grand narratives were over-determined, our world now looks radically under-determined.

Partly as a result, there has been a diversification of the national myth of origins. All states have such self-images and there is nothing remarkable in the UK having one or several. The more powerful the state, the more its myth of origins tends to pass unchallenged, as in the present-day United States. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A World without End: Jonathan Clark, Editor of a Major New History of the British Isles, Considers What Effect the Intellectual Currents of Our Own Time Have Had on the Way Historians Write
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.