At Last, We Know the Truth: Labour Despises Anyone Who Loves Britain, Its Values and Its History
Byline: by Melanie Phillips
OF ALL the issues of concern to the public, immigration is possibly the most explosive -- and the one about which the most lies are continuing to be told.
During the period that Labour has been in office, mass immigration has simply changed the face of Britain. The total number of immigrants since 1997 is pushing three million.
Ministers claim that immigration policy has been driven principally to help the economy. They have always denied that they actually set out deliberately to change the ethnic composition of the country.
Well, now we know for a certainty that this is not true. The Government embarked on a policy of mass immigration to change Britain into a multicultural society -- and they kept this momentous aim secret from the people whose votes they sought.
Worse still, they did this knowing that it ran directly counter to the wishes of those voters, whose concerns about immigration they dismissed as racist; and they further concealed official warnings that large-scale immigration would bring about significant increases in crime.
The truth about this scandal was first blurted out last October by Andrew Neather, a former Labour Party speechwriter. He wrote that until the new points-based system limiting foreign workers was introduced in 2008 -- in response to increasing public uproar -- government policy for the previous eight years had been aimed at promoting mass immigration.
The 'driving political purpose' of this policy, wrote Neather, was 'to make the UK truly multicultural' -- and one subsidiary motivation was 'to rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date'.
Ministers, however, went to great lengths to keep their real intentions secret from the public -- with, said Neather, a 'paranoia' that these would reach the media -- since they knew their core white workingclass voters would react very badly.
Accordingly, a report about immigration by a government advisory unit, which formed the core of a landmark speech in 2000 announcing the loosening of border controls, went through several drafts before it was finally published -- and the Government's true intentions Government's true intentions about changing Britain into a multicultural society were removed from the final version.
After revealing all this, Neather subsequently tried to backtrack, saying that his views had been twisted out of all recognition by the media. They hadn't been.
Nevertheless, Jack Straw, who was Home Secretary at the time the immigration policy was changed, said he had read press reports of Neather's remarks with incredulity since they were 'the reverse of the truth'.
Now we know, however, that they were indeed the truth. We know this only because details of the advisory unit's report which were excised from the final published version -- just as Neather said -- have been emerging into the public domain through Freedom of Information requests.
The pressure group MigrationWatch obtained an early draft which revealed that the Government's intention was to encourage mass immigration for 'social objectives' --in other words, to produce a more ethnically diverse society -- but that on no fewer than six occasions this phrase was excised from the final version, published some three months later. Now we further discover, from what was removed from seemingly another early draft, that the aim was not just to implement this policy of mass immigration without the knowledge or consent of the British people. It was done in the full knowledge that the people actually wanted immigration reduced.
And we also discover that those who expressed such concerns were dismissed with utter contempt as racists --and it was further suggested that ministers should manipulate public opinion in an attempt to change people's attitudes. …