Warts and All: The Impact of Candour in Assessing Character for Admission to the Legal Profession

By Mullins, Debra | University of Queensland Law Journal, December 2009 | Go to article overview

Warts and All: The Impact of Candour in Assessing Character for Admission to the Legal Profession


Mullins, Debra, University of Queensland Law Journal


A person who seeks admission to the legal profession must be a fit and proper person to be admitted. (1) One aspect of that criterion is that the person is of good fame and character. (2) Past conduct has invariably been treated by admitting bodies as indicative of a person's character and suitability for undertaking the professional duties and responsibilities of a lawyer.

Admission procedures require the applicant to disclose relevant past conduct. The applicant is the one person who has full knowledge of his or her past conduct that may bear on the person's character and fitness to practise. The applicant's candour in disclosing past conduct or lack of candour about past conduct may affect the outcome of the admission application.

Reference will be made to categories of past conduct that may be relevant in determining whether an applicant for admission is of good character. The effect of the applicant's candour about past conduct on the assessment of the applicant's character will then be examined.

In considering cases in which candour has played a significant role in determining whether an applicant is successfully admitted to the legal profession, the issue arises whether the emphasis on candour has overshadowed the assessment of the applicant's character by reference to past misconduct.

I Past Conduct

Whether an applicant for admission is of good fame and of good character invites a wide-ranging enquiry. The categories of past conduct that may be of relevance to the admitting body's task are extensive. Some guidance may be provided by the statutory provisions covering admission where there is a list of matters relating to suitability for admission. (3) Obvious conduct that must be disclosed includes convictions for dishonesty offences, convictions for other types of criminal offences, guilty pleas to criminal offences that do not result in the recording of convictions, (4) academic misconduct in the course of University studies, bankruptcy or other insolvency, investigations by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission of companies associated with an applicant, any restriction on an applicant's right to engage in legal practice in another jurisdiction, whether an applicant is the subject of a restraining or other type of order directed at preventing domestic violence, and persistent traffic breaches. (5) The need to disclose other past conduct might not be as obvious to an applicant, but if it has the potential to be relevant to the admitting body's consideration of the application, it must be disclosed. (6) This includes criminal proceedings which have not resulted in convictions, (7) prior history of depression and the circumstances in which the applicant left the army, (8) and an unresolved contempt allegation arising out of litigation conducted personally by the applicant. (9)

II Candour in Disclosing Past Conduct

The critical role played by candour in disclosing past conduct was emphasised by the High Court in Re Davis} (10) Although that decision was concerned with the removal of the appellant's name from the roll of barristers after admission, it was the appellant's lack of candour about past conduct for the purpose of his admission that was the basis of the decision. The appellant had been admitted as a barrister in 1946 without disclosing to the two solicitors who provided certificates as to his character or to the Barristers' Admission Board, when he applied to the Board to be a student-at-law and then for admission, that he had been convicted of breaking and entering. He committed the offence in 1934 when he was 20 years old. Subsequently he had led a life of scrupulous honesty. The appellant's conviction was revealed to the Supreme Court of New South Wales in 1947. The appellant had to show cause why he should not be disbarred. The appellant obtained affidavits attesting to his character from the two solicitors who had previously provided certificates as to his character, the Attorney-General for New South Wales, a professor of law, a minister of religion and a detective constable of police. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Warts and All: The Impact of Candour in Assessing Character for Admission to the Legal Profession
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.