The Date and Context of a Stone Row: Cut Hill, Dartmoor, South-West England

By Fyfe, Ralph M.; Greeves, Tom | Antiquity, March 2010 | Go to article overview

The Date and Context of a Stone Row: Cut Hill, Dartmoor, South-West England


Fyfe, Ralph M., Greeves, Tom, Antiquity


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Introduction

The development of monumental landscapes in many parts of Western Europe in the third millennium BC, characterised by the construction of structures in earth, stone and timber, is argued to represent the physical manifestation of significant social change within prehistory (Bradley 1998; Thomas 1999; Tilley 2004). The construction of monuments represents either a change, or formalisation, in the relationships between place, space and society, and establishes locations for key social practices and performances (Cummings 2008; Gillings et al. 2008). Stone rows and settings are amongst the least understood monument types to be found in north-west Europe. Their form and scale can be visually impressive, and a number of examples appear to be part of larger ceremonial complexes; however, despite their ubiquity in parts of western Britain, Ireland and Brittany (Burl 1993), some of the basic understandings and premises concerning these monuments (e.g. function and chronology) are currently unclear.

Dense concentrations of stone rows and settings can be found on the uplands of south-west England, and the various rows and settings on Dartmoor, Bodmin Moor and Exmoor have been the subject of surveys and gazetteers which have detailed the shape and topographic positioning of monuments (e.g. Emmett 1979; Johnson & Rose 1994; Butler 1997; Riley & Wilson-North 2001). Although various functional hypotheses have been proposed, there is little consensus as to their chronology or the role they played within prehistoric society. It has been argued that rows may have provided guides to astronomical alignment (Lockyer 1906; Ruggles 1985), played a mnemonic function to confirm or establish the location of an individual within their known world (Tilley 1995), marked different land use zones (Barnatt 1982; Johnston 2005), or acted as revelatory monuments, leading the individual to key visual locations that reference or reveal other parts of the landscape (Herring 2008). It is not the purpose of this paper to review or critique these suggestions; rather, it is to consider one of the more fundamental uncertainties pertaining to stone rows; the question of chronology. The age of these monuments is currently unclear. None have been directly dated, and chronological assumptions typically rely on association with other monument types. In 2004 a new stone row was discovered on Cut Hill on central northern Dartmoor that has potential to shed crucial light on the dating of stone rows. This paper presents the results of survey and trial excavation at Cut Hill designed expressly to recover dating samples, and considers the significance of the results for the wider understanding of stone rows on Dartmoor and the wider region.

Stone rows: form and assumed chronologies

In his comprehensive survey of stone rows from Western Europe, Burl provides a model for the chronology of this type of archaeological site (1993), dividing them into three main groups. Long single rows, with more than seven stones, are broadly assigned to the period 2100-1600 cal BC. Multiple rows, with parallel or fan-shaped arrangements, are thought to date to the period 3000-1500 cal BC. Short rows, with six or fewer stones, are broadly assigned to the period 1800-1000 cal BC. The basis for this proposed chronology of stone rows is, however, poor, with little or no secure, independent, scientific dating control. Chronologies are dependent upon one or more of: (a) astronomical dating, tied to interpretative frameworks of monuments' functions (e.g. Ruggles 1985), where rows are assumed to relate to particular stellar alignments whose position in prehistory can be calculated; (b) stratigraphic or (more usually) spatial associations with other datable archaeological features, including artefacts and structures; or (c) general typological analogy across regions, which inevitably becomes circular in the absence of secure, independent dating. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Date and Context of a Stone Row: Cut Hill, Dartmoor, South-West England
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.