Two Wrongs Make a Wrong: A Challenge to Plea Bargaining and Collateral Consequence Statutes through Their Integration

By O'Keefe, Kevin | Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Winter 2010 | Go to article overview

Two Wrongs Make a Wrong: A Challenge to Plea Bargaining and Collateral Consequence Statutes through Their Integration


O'Keefe, Kevin, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology


I. INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of plea bargaining in the U.S. criminal justice system is undisputed, though the desirability of such a system has been a subject of considerable debate for decades. (1) Regardless of the constitutional improprieties and injustices that both sides of the debate recognize as flaws inherent to the system, both sides acknowledge that plea bargaining derives most of its justification from the principles of contract. (2) The individual defendant exchanges certain constitutional rights for a more lenient sentence with absolute certainty. (3) The prosecution, as the agent of the state, foregoes the opportunity to pursue a higher sentence for the defendant and saves the time and expense of proving the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. (4) A closer inspection of the particulars of the plea bargaining system reveals that the plea bargain is not the classical theoretical bargain. (5) However, the basic justification for its existence is that, at its most fundamental level, the plea bargain is a mutual exchange of considerations between two parties: the individual defendant and the state. (6)

Much like plea bargaining, postconviction civil penalties, arising out of what are known as collateral consequence statutes, have been part of the U.S. criminal justice system for a considerable period of time. (7) At least with respect to convicted sexual offenders, the use of collateral consequences to punish individual defendants further after sentencing has become a pervasive practice in the United States. Most notably, on September 13, 1994, the Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act (Wetterling Act) was signed into law. (8) Individual states have been creating their own systems of sexual offender registration since 1947; (9) however, with the enactment of the Wetterling Act, states are now required to devise and implement sexual offender registration systems. (10) While this was by no means the first instance of a collateral consequence statute, nor the beginning of the trend towards imposing civil penalties against convicted sexual offenders, (11) the passage of the Wetterling Act represented the first federal imposition of collateral consequences upon any criminal defendant convicted of a sexually based offense. (12) Through subsequent amendments and bills, Congress has supplemented this initial mandate with many more requirements for the state registration systems, most recently in the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Walsh Act). (13)

Plea bargaining and collateral consequence statutes are two entirely separate practices, but are similar in the sense that neither seems to comport with the classic model of criminal justice: a trial followed by a sentence imposed by the trial court. Additionally, both practices are ubiquitous in the modern criminal justice system. By way of illustration, in the federal court system, guilty pleas account for 96% of convictions, (14) and over forty different post-sentence restrictions automatically apply to individuals convicted of felonies. (15) Accordingly, any analysis of collateral consequence statutes in the modern criminal justice system needs to be conducted with an eye toward plea bargaining, and vice versa. And because these individual practices are so prevalent, the constitutional analyses and theoretical bases of plea bargaining and collateral consequences should be revisited with emphasis on their integration.

This Comment focuses on the sexual offender collateral consequence statutes, and the Walsh Act in particular, for two reasons. First, sexual offender collateral consequences have often been (and now must be, per the Walsh Act) applied retroactively. (16) In other words, defendants who were convicted and served their sentences completely prior to the enactment of a collateral consequence statute are still subject to registration and notification requirements, (17) Second, offenders are assessed civil penalties by way of the collateral consequence statute based solely on their previous conviction. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Two Wrongs Make a Wrong: A Challenge to Plea Bargaining and Collateral Consequence Statutes through Their Integration
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.