Selection of Rational Dispute Resolution Method by Applying New Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA)/Racionalaus Gincu Sprendimo Budo Nustatymas Taikant Nauja Kriteriju Svoriu Nustatymo Metoda, Pagrista Nuosekliu Laipsnisku Poriniu Kriteriju Santykines Svarbos Lyginimu

By Kersuliene, Violeta; Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras et al. | Journal of Business Economics and Management, June 2010 | Go to article overview

Selection of Rational Dispute Resolution Method by Applying New Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA)/Racionalaus Gincu Sprendimo Budo Nustatymas Taikant Nauja Kriteriju Svoriu Nustatymo Metoda, Pagrista Nuosekliu Laipsnisku Poriniu Kriteriju Santykines Svarbos Lyginimu


Kersuliene, Violeta, Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras, Turskis, Zenonas, Journal of Business Economics and Management


1. Introduction

Disputes are a reality in every business project. If the parties cannot reach a resolution themselves, expensive, time-consuming legal procedure begins, which severely affects all the participants. Conflict analysis and resolution play an important role in business, governmental, political and lawsuits disputes. The sooner the conflict can be identified and addressed, the higher the percentage of resolution success and the lower the cost. Principles including government laws, industrial self-regulation, and contracts agreed by parties involved should be the basic guidelines to attain a fair and justified solution (Xu and Yuan 2008). If the dispute cannot be settled amicably, the parties can go to court or consider other dispute settlement procedures such as mediation, conciliation, etc. Recently, in countries of both general and continental traditions of law one can note increasingly active interest of researchers in alternative methods of dispute resolution (Bingham 2002; Chan and Suen 2005; Koolwijk 2006; Gebken and Gibson 2006; Gabuthy et al. 2008; Ma et al. 2008).

In global practice, the following alternative dispute resolution methods are considered to be the main ones:

1) Mutual negotiations of parties without mediators.

2) Conciliation procedure, the purpose of which is to achieve that parties end their dispute by a peace agreement; the conciliation procedure may be performed by a person selected by the parties, a judge or other civil servant.

3) Transfer of dispute for solution by an expert selected by the parties, for example, for determination of building defects or amount of remuneration.

4) Examination of dispute with participation of lawyers of the parties and a mediator (mini-trial).

5) Mediation--negotiations between parties with mediation of a selected person.

6) Arbitration--dispute of parties is solved with the help of arbiters (ad hoc arbitration) or the dispute resolution is organised by a permanent institution (institutional arbitration).

The definition of alternative dispute resolution is constantly expanding to include new techniques.

In each particular case analysis of negative and positive features of various dispute resolution methods allows evaluating the perspective of judicial litigation and application of other dispute resolution methods. Such knowledge allows reasonably and deliberately to select the most suitable method for dispute resolution--litigation in court, arbitration, mediation, etc. Private conflict resolution methods, of which the most frequently used are negotiation, mediation and arbitration, are considered as alternative dispute resolution methods. While resolving disputes in any of the methods mentioned by using administrative or organizational leverage, it is sought to affect circumstances and stimulate the dispute parties to agree constructively.

Determination of rational method for dispute resolution is an issue of special relevance. This is so because of a few reasons: first of all, resolution of disputes requires complex legal, technological, engineering, economic, etc. knowledge; secondly, disputes frequently stop development of business projects; thirdly, for disputes parties it is very important that their disputes have a minimum impact on their amicable business relations in future. Problems of rational dispute resolution generally are large and complex, involving many interested parties, often with sharply differing beliefs and values.

It is an extremely important decision of the dispute to justify the choice to find a rational option. Disputes may prevent further cooperation, the implementation of business projects development , etc. Parties, which are included in the dispute, in order to select the most preferable way of a dispute resolution method, are facing with a choice problem, i.e. which procedure is the best for decision-making. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Selection of Rational Dispute Resolution Method by Applying New Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA)/Racionalaus Gincu Sprendimo Budo Nustatymas Taikant Nauja Kriteriju Svoriu Nustatymo Metoda, Pagrista Nuosekliu Laipsnisku Poriniu Kriteriju Santykines Svarbos Lyginimu
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.