British Politics after the Election

By Mullen, Richard | Contemporary Review, Summer 2010 | Go to article overview

British Politics after the Election

Mullen, Richard, Contemporary Review

THE most extraordinary British General Election since at least 1945 has resulted in the most extraordinary British government of modern times. The election's results grew increasingly unpredictable as it developed and those results outstripped the wildest imaginations, be they dreams or nightmares, of virtually every participant or observer. One thing is certain: British politics are now changed forever.

For three decades political life has revolved round two lengthy periods of dominance by one party. In 1979 Margaret Thatcher began a period of eighteen years of Conservative government. This was brought to an end by Tony Blair's landslide victory in 1997. If Thatcher harkened back to the traditional past, Blair looked forward to an American style of leadership. Sometimes described as Britain's first 'American prime minister', he came in on a tide of enthusiasm where only hardened realists or perhaps cynics (I am pleased to have been both) dared to doubt that a new glorious dawn had arisen accompanied by a suitable rock 'n' roll ditty of 'things can only get better'. Yet many things got far worse. The self-lauded 'straight kinda guy' embarked on a glitzy government that led to disappointed hopes, unfulfilled dreams, increasing corruption and a disastrous war all camouflaged by a troop of disgusting 'spin doctors' and ruthless manipulators of truth. Undoubtedly there were some reputable achievements and some improvements in public services, especially the NHS which has an array of impressive new buildings and equipment. Some sensible policies such as the Minimum Wage and Civil Partnerships dealt with genuine problems in a typical, old-fashioned pragmatic British way. Yet throughout, the Blair premiership was riven by the bitter rivalry between the Prime Minister and his all-powerful Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown, a man of far greater intellect but a man conspicuously lacking the facile charm of Blair. As the product of a genuinely Socialist background, Brown fumed at the deprivation of what he regarded as his birthright, the leadership of the Labour Party.

Brown was given almost exclusive control over financial policy and therefore of much of domestic policy while Blair concentrated on what increasingly became his obsession, foreign policy, where he embarked on a messianic mission in the 'war on terror'. Brown had some notable achievements as Chancellor. On his first day in office he restored to the Bank of England the freedom to set interest rates but he also made the fatal decision to remove its regulatory powers over the banks. It would take a decade before we saw the consequences of the unrestrained lending that this unleashed. Brown's other good decision - now evidently obvious to all - was to keep Britain out of the euro to the annoyance of Blair, always anxious to clamber aboard any idealistic bandwagon. Brown seemed to succeed wonderfully as Chancellor and for once Blair's usual hyperbole proclaiming him the 'greatest Chancellor' in British history seemed not entirely outlandish. Brown continually boasted in every Budget speech that he had 'ended boom and bust'. What he actually did in the middle years of the Blair government was to embark on vast programmes of government spending adding almost one million new people to the government payroll, all equally recruited to Brown's client state. He who works for the government tends to vote for the party of government growth. Everything began to go wrong shortly after Blair resigned when a Brownite coup drove him from Downing Street in 2007. Brown liked to argue that the credit crunch and bank failures were the result of a global problem made in the US but his long-term polices had already laden Britain with a huge annual deficit and a vast mountain of debt which makes the UK uniquely ill-placed to withstand the financial storms.

One result of Blair's victory in 1997 was the weakening of the Conservative Party, which had been the dominant force in politics for most of the twentieth century. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Note: primary sources have slightly different requirements for citation. Please see these guidelines for more information.

Cited article

British Politics after the Election


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

    New feature

    It is estimated that 1 in 10 people have dyslexia, and in an effort to make Questia easier to use for those people, we have added a new choice of font to the Reader. That font is called OpenDyslexic, and has been designed to help with some of the symptoms of dyslexia. For more information on this font, please visit

    To use OpenDyslexic, choose it from the Typeface list in Font settings.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search


    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.