To Measure or Not to Measure? the "Recidivism Dilemma"

By Stoodley, Bartlett | Corrections Today, August 2010 | Go to article overview

To Measure or Not to Measure? the "Recidivism Dilemma"


Stoodley, Bartlett, Corrections Today


All across the country, juvenile justice agencies are judged to be successful or not based on recidivism rates that indicate the extent to which youths commit crimes after receiving juvenile justice services. Because of the importance of this measure, the Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators (CJCA), with support from the Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), has identified three goals related to recidivism measurement: 1) Reduce re-offending; 2) Increase support for evidence-based programs (both proven and promising); and 3) Support the continuous quality improvement of programs and systems of services.

CJCA, the membership organization of state juvenile correctional directors, established a Recidivism Working Group, comprised of directors and researchers, to develop and recommend to the full membership standards for measuring recidivism. This work was completed and a final report was disseminated in late 2009. (1)

Background

The number of juveniles discharged from correctional and treatment facilities each year has grown significantly from decades past, creating concerns about how to effectively prevent their return to custody. Compounding difficulties inherent in large numbers of juveniles reentering communities is the recidivism rate for these returning juveniles. Rates of juvenile re-offending can be as high as 66 percent when measured by re-arrest and as high as 33 percent when measured by re-adjudications and/or reconvictions within a few years of release. (2) Accurately estimating a national juvenile recidivism rate is problematic. Currently, the most accurate nationwide juvenile recidivism statistics may be found by aggregating state rates of juvenile recidivism. However, as evidenced by the varying recidivism rates, recidivism findings can differ greatly depending on how recidivism is defined and measured.

This is not a new concern. The National Advisory Committee on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals observed the following in 1976:

A major problem in research on criminal justice is the absence of standardized definitions ... The confusion over definitions has not only impeded communication among researchers and practitioners, but also has hindered comparisons and replications of research studies.

Program Effectiveness, Accountability and Cost

It is uncommon to conduct a program impact evaluation in juvenile justice without measuring recidivism. Despite challenges presented by definitional ambiguity and misuse of recidivism data, a program's recidivism rate is generally regarded as the most critical indicator of program success. Valid comparisons of programs or systems require comparability of populations whose data are being used to calculate outcome measures such as recidivism. Aside from experimental designs in which similar youths are assigned to different conditions, knowing the risk level (probability of re-offending) of youths in comparison groups makes it possible to reduce the impact of some of the many factors that may explain differences in recidivism rates.

Other Important Considerations

Every measure of recidivism based on an official record always involves both the behavior or alleged behavior of a youth and a formal decision made by at least one official of the justice system. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

To Measure or Not to Measure? the "Recidivism Dilemma"
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.