"The Attila the Hun Law": New York's Rockefeller Drug Laws and the Making of a Punitive State

By Kohler-Hausmann, Julilly | Journal of Social History, Fall 2010 | Go to article overview

"The Attila the Hun Law": New York's Rockefeller Drug Laws and the Making of a Punitive State


Kohler-Hausmann, Julilly, Journal of Social History


During his annual address to the legislature in 1973, Governor Nelson Rockefeller shocked the political establishment by declaring that New York State's drug treatment programs--programs he had championed for over a decade--were abject failures. He explained that it was time to come clean with the legislature and the people of New York:

  It is a time for brutal honesty regarding narcotics addiction ... In
  this state, we have allotted over $1 billion to every form of
  education against drugs and treatment of the addict through
  commitment, therapy, and rehabilitation. But let's he frank-let's
  tell it like it is: We have achieved very little permanent
  rehabilitation-and have found no cure. (1)

What the situation demanded, the governor explained, was a stern new policy of deterrence that repudiated the state's earlier emphasis on rehabilitation and reintegrating drug users into society. Rockefeller insisted this drastic move was imperative because "[t]he hard drug pusher destroys lives just as surely as and far more cruelly than a cold-blooded killer. Me threatens our society as a whole. ..." (2) To stave off this disaster, he called on New York state to punish drug dealing more harshly than rape, kidnapping, and even murder:

  I, therefore, will ask for legislation making the penalty for all
  illegal trafficking in hard drugs a life sentence in prison. To close
  all avenues for escaping the full force of this sentence, the law
  would forbid acceptance of a plea to a lesser charge, forbid
  probation, forbid parole and forbid suspension of sentence. (3)

A few months later, the New York legislature answered Rockefeller's call and passed a mildly diluted version of his proposal, enacting the harshest narcotics laws in the nation.

This article investigates what led Nelson Rockefeller to reverse his course and reject the era's reigning assumptions regarding drug abuse. It explores the ideological and political work accomplished by this high profile legislation--for policy makers, for members of the general public who clamored for "get tough" strategies, and for the drug users targeted by the laws. To capture the implications of Rockefeller's proposal for political culture, this study focuses mainly on the social and cultural history of this legislation, and only tangentially follows the intricacies of the drug policy debates or the institutional history of drug treatment in New York.

After outlining this article's principal arguments and its relationship to wider scholarly literatures, I review what, made rising crime and drug use a potent political issue in the early 1970s and analyze how citizens framed these problems in their correspondence with Rockefeller. The next section explores the governor's dramatic embrace of his punitive drug proposal, the public's response, and the implications of the laws' eventual passage. The final segment investigates how drug offenders interpreted the new laws and represented themselves in the face of a program committed to ostracizing and silencing them. I conclude with a discussion of how this examination of the Rockefeller Drug Laws contributes to our broader understanding of punitive policy's political utility and the specific ways such legislation empowered conservative politicians and rationalized neo-liberal political projects.

The Rockefeller Drug Laws are critical to study because they served as inspiration for the "War on Drug" policies enacted nationwide that have fueled the unprecedented recent explosion in incarceration. As an early experiment in articulating new visions for government, the Rockefeller Drug Laws were not only a formative historical event in their own right, but they also shed light onto the wider phenomena of "get tough" criminal policies and rhetoric that escalated in the 1970s. Even more generally, they were instrumental in the profound renegotiation of the state's role, responsibilities, and character occurring in society at this time. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • A full archive of books and articles related to this one
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

"The Attila the Hun Law": New York's Rockefeller Drug Laws and the Making of a Punitive State
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

    Already a member? Log in now.