Judge Orders End of 'Don't Ask'; Military Told to Stop Enforcing Its Policy Banning Open Gays
Byline: Valerie Richardson, THE WASHINGTON TIMES
A federal judge in California on Tuesday ordered the U.S. military to stop enforcing the 17-year-old policy banning openly gay service members, the policy known as don't ask, don't tell.
Judge Virginia Phillips issued a permanent injunction against don't ask, don't tell from her court in Riverside, Calif., declaring that the policy infringes the fundamental rights of United States service members and prospective service members.
Her injunction applies to U.S. military personnel serving throughout the world. She also ordered the federal government and military immediately to suspend and discontinue any investigation, or discharge, separation, or other proceeding that may have been commenced under the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Act.
The judge had ruled the policy unconstitutional in a Sept. 9 decision, but delayed issuing the injunction for a month in order to give the Obama administration's Justice Department an opportunity to respond.
Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler said Tuesday the decision was under review. The department has 60 days to file an appeal.
Log Cabin Republicans, the party's most prominent gay rights organization, filed the lawsuit in 2004 and hailed Tuesday's ruling as a complete and total victory. But the group warned that the case isn't yet closed, noting that the administration may still appeal the decision.
No longer will our military be compelled to discharge service members with valuable skills and experience because of an archaic policy mandating irrational discrimination, said Christian Berle, deputy executive director of Log Cabin Republicans.
Supporters of don't ask, don't tell denounced the ruling as a blatant example of judicial activism undercutting the democratic process. The Senate last month debated legislation to repeal don't ask, don't tell - already approved by the House of Representatives - as an amendment to a defense-authorization bill, but proponents could not overcome a filibuster.
Once again, an activist federal judge is using the military to advance a liberal social agenda, disregarding the views of all four military service chiefs and the constitutional role of Congress, said Family Research Council President Tony Perkins. This move will only further the desire of voters to change Congress.
In most cases, federal lawyers would be expected to challenge an adverse ruling, but this case comes with an unusual set of circumstances. President Obama has said he personally favors repeal of don't ask, don't tell, and allowing the deadline to pass without filing an appeal would enable him to deliver a top priority for his party's gay supporters without the risks of a nasty congressional battle.
Mr. Obama may need more political cover as the Justice Department also revealed Tuesday that it will appeal a separate ruling from a federal court in Massachusetts that found the federal Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional.
U.S. District Judge Joseph Tauro in Boston ruled in July for several gay couples who had argued that the Defense of Marriage Act interfered with the rights of states to define marriage. The administration is defending the 1996 law, even though Mr. Obama at one time said he opposed it as well.
Critics of don't ask, don't tell quickly issued statements Tuesday advising the Obama administration to accept the judge's ruling.
Legal experts have agreed that the Department of Justice is under no obligation to appeal this ruling, said Aaron Belkin, executive director of the Palm Center, a think tank at the University of California at Santa Barbara that supports ending the ban. …