A 'Tea Party' on Trade Policy?

The Washington Times (Washington, DC), November 3, 2010 | Go to article overview

A 'Tea Party' on Trade Policy?


Byline: Alan Tonelson, SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The tea party movement plainly has shaken up American politics and economic policymaking. Will international economic policy be next?

From its early 2009 inception, the tea party has been practically synonymous with free-market absolutism. And certainly the Washington operators who have funded much tea-party activity - such as former Republican House Majority Leader Dick Armey - were expecting the movement to fuel a push-back against the hypergovernment they accused both major parties of building.

Yet many and possibly most tea-party activists have voiced support for at least two major economics-related exceptions to government minimalism.

The first, of course, entails the pro-amnesty open-borders immigration policy long pushed by Republican establishmentarians in and out of government. The second entails the outsourcing-focused trade policies so dear to the hearts and wallets of mainstream Republicans, their big-business and Wall Street supporters, and many Democrats.

Major tea-party qualms about open borders trade policies initially surfaced in a poll released in June by the steel industry's Alliance for American Manufacturing. Conducted by prominent Democratic and Republican polling firms, the survey found that tea-party supporters generally favor strong, explicitly pro-manufacturing government policies, including pro-manufacturing trade policies - a position that clashes loudly with libertarians' strong opposition to government picking winners and losers. Indeed, nearly as many tea-party supporters as Americans overall (78 percent versus 81 percent) favor a national manufacturing strategy - including trade policies - to help support manufacturing in the U.S.

Just 27 percent of tea-party supporters endorse doing whatever is necessary to revitalize manufacturing. But just 39 percent of the general public backs this open-ended proposal. More important, however, fully 57 percent of tea-party supporters - compared with 47 percent of the general public - agree that manufacturing should be helped but only if government's role is limited to incentives and trade policy.

Libertarian Washington insiders might respond that these tea-party positions dovetail with the traditional trade-policy goal of expanding exports. Yet tea-partiers agree more strongly than the general public that Washington should stop unfair trade practices, illegal subsidies and enforce environmental and labor standards - proposals that are anathema to libertarian outsourcers.

Further, a Wall Street Journal/NBC News survey published last month showed that 61 percent of tea partiers say trade agreements have hurt the United States - fully 8 percentage points higher than the result for the general public.

Talk and even responses to sophisticated surveys, however, can be cheap. Will tea-party supporters actually send these messages actively and forcefully to politicians? …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A 'Tea Party' on Trade Policy?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Author Advanced search

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.