Philosophers and Technologists: Vicarious and Virtual Knowledge Constructs

By McNeese, Beverly D. | Forum on Public Policy: A Journal of the Oxford Round Table, Winter 2007 | Go to article overview

Philosophers and Technologists: Vicarious and Virtual Knowledge Constructs


McNeese, Beverly D., Forum on Public Policy: A Journal of the Oxford Round Table


Abstract

In an age of continual technological advancement, user-friendly software, and consumer demand for the latest upgraded gadget, the ethical and moral discoveries derived from a careful reading of any fictional literature by college students is struggling in the American college classroom. Easy access information systems, coinciding with the application of some excellent study strategies--such as topic sentence, points of evidence, etc.--have produced students who not only do not enjoy the process and the adventure of reading a story, but disconnect from the possibility of their own vicarious experience by over-utilizing the methodical breakdown of the components; therefore, reducing the "process of story or epic" to one of isolated facts to be memorized in a hurry-up world: individuated components of a scientific formula.

While the upper-echelon of modern science might enjoy the heady intellectual gymnastics of creating merged intelligence, as discussed in Ray Kurzweil's The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology, the non-reading college students as users / consumers continue to be unable to construct their own knowledge into applicable and meaningful forms of thinking. These forms include the critical thinking skills for ethical and moral thought for which individual immersion into literature allows--the test case of the imagination. The current trend toward utilitarian reading can be reversed through a concentrated and highly structured workshop approach that simultaneously demands personal responses to literature and creative expression by the student, so as to foster an appreciation of the telling of the human story. The arts and sciences, through a well-read population, should work together; otherwise, future moral and ethical decisions will be made upon the premise of expediency and the validity of performance, without the human-defining traits as embodied in the archetypal literatures of past and current cultures.

Introduction

In the introduction to The Two Cultures, Stefan Collini comments upon the cultural anxiety felt by those contemporaries of the Romantic Era living through the birth pangs of the Industrial Revolution. As noted by multiple commentators, a paradigm shift of such significant import as to affect both practical day-to-day living and philosophical approaches to the established disciplines of thought occurred during and as a result of the Industrial Revolution. Encapsulated in this general anxiety were the specific fears "that calculation and measurement generally might be displacing cultivation and compassion" (Snow 1998, xi), as well as that of "religious belief and practical piety" (ibid., xi). The direct correlation to present-day social and educational anxieties, with the rapid infusion of applied science technologies in commerce, education, and leisure, is the "fissure in types of knowledge" (ibid., x) which could damage "both individual cultivation and social well-being" (ibid., x).

Just as an agriculturally-based economy was jolted and redirected into a manufacturing-based economy, and, since then, a consumer-based economy, so the reign of the sciences through applied technology and consumerism has superseded the humanities, most notably since Snow's lecture, with the advent of computers and software that is pervasive in most areas of life, particularly in the 21st century classroom. Although current Western social and educational systems advance the convenience and benefit of applied technology, it is this very emphasis upon speed and efficiency that may be fragmenting and confusing to students.

Consequently, within specialties within disciplines, a common approach, and a common language of definitions, must be defined by worldview and content. For instance, Collini's apt example refers to the divergent approaches in academic disciplines to the act of writing. Generally, humanities views writing as a process; whereas, science refers to "writing up" a paper or report. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Philosophers and Technologists: Vicarious and Virtual Knowledge Constructs
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Help
Full screen

matching results for page

    Questia reader help

    How to highlight and cite specific passages

    1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
    2. Click or tap the last word you want to select, and you’ll see everything in between get selected.
    3. You’ll then get a menu of options like creating a highlight or a citation from that passage of text.

    OK, got it!

    Cited passage

    Style
    Citations are available only to our active members.
    Buy instant access to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

    "Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

    1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

    Cited passage

    Thanks for trying Questia!

    Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

    Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

    Buy instant access to save your work.

    Already a member? Log in now.

    Oops!

    An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.